Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use case: Mashup multiple layers of map tile data or features in a map #11

Open
prushforth opened this issue Apr 20, 2019 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
discussion: use case a possible use case: should it be included? what should it say? status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete

Comments

@prushforth
Copy link
Member

prushforth commented Apr 20, 2019

This issue is for discussion of the map viewer use case “Mashup multiple layers of map tile data or features in a map”, its examples & list of required capabilities.


The ability to add and remove layers to yhe map is a fundamental use case, common to most Web map libraries. OTOH, most map libraries don't use URLs to refer to layers, because there is no commonly understood layer representation.

@AmeliaBR AmeliaBR changed the title Layers Use Case: Layer together multiple map data sources Apr 21, 2019
@AmeliaBR AmeliaBR added discussion: use case a possible use case: should it be included? what should it say? status: suggestion this issue discusses a suggested addition to the report, that is not yet in the draft labels Apr 21, 2019
@AmeliaBR AmeliaBR added the section: map viewer Capabilities & use cases for declarative map viewer widgets label May 26, 2019
@AmeliaBR AmeliaBR added status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete and removed status: suggestion this issue discusses a suggested addition to the report, that is not yet in the draft labels May 27, 2019
@AmeliaBR AmeliaBR removed the section: map viewer Capabilities & use cases for declarative map viewer widgets label Jul 25, 2019
@Malvoz Malvoz changed the title Use Case: Layer together multiple map data sources Use case: Combine multiple layers of map tile data or features Apr 28, 2021
@caseymm
Copy link

caseymm commented Nov 23, 2021

Hoping I can get a bit of clarification on this... The title of this issue, "Use case: Combine multiple layers of map tile data or features," suggests to me that you're suggesting combining all map layers that contain data (points, polylines, other overlays, etc.) into one single layer. I also asked @zcorpan about this and he said that he thought it meant including the ability for a map to show multiple layers (as opposed to my understanding of all layers being flattened into one). Are either of these interpretations correct?

@prushforth
Copy link
Member Author

you're suggesting combining all map layers that contain data (points, polylines, other overlays, etc.) into one single layer. I also asked @zcorpan about this and he said that he thought it meant including the ability for a map to show multiple layers

Simon is correct, but I can appreciate the confusion.

@prushforth prushforth changed the title Use case: Combine multiple layers of map tile data or features Use case: Mashup multiple layers of map tile data or features in a map Nov 24, 2021
@prushforth
Copy link
Member Author

@caseymm I renamed the issue, hopefully that is clearer. The intent is per Simon's interpretation; of course it's hard to tell how something is interpreted, language being what it is.

@Malvoz
Copy link
Member

Malvoz commented Dec 7, 2021

@prushforth We'd want to change the title in the document as well. Though I think the new title too can be interpreted as merging/fusing tile data and features into 1 layer, is "Display features or title data from multiple layers" clearer perhaps?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion: use case a possible use case: should it be included? what should it say? status: placeholder there's a matching section heading / some text in the report, but it's far from complete
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants