馃悰 Use .cleanContent instead of .content #379
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Sorry - I haven't forgotten about this! I just haven't had time to fully test the feature & differences locally. Should have more free time this summer as I've said in Discord 馃槃 Very grateful for your help! |
|
All good, merge when you can :) |
MarcusOtter
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request replaces
message.contentwithmessage.cleanContentin the thread creation process, which resolves mentions to their actual text.Only needed to change one line, which feels like it shouldn't "just work", but I think it does.