Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

G29: Report final position back to host when using MBL #3775

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2016

Conversation

jbrazio
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrazio jbrazio commented May 17, 2016

Closes #3770, fix by @Blue-Marlin.. but too lazy to submit it !

馃嵒

@jbrazio jbrazio added this to the 1.1.0 milestone May 17, 2016
@thinkyhead
Copy link
Member

thinkyhead commented May 17, 2016

Very nice. Do we also have a PR (or want to extend this) to keep the nozzle where it is at the end of probing, instead of moving it back down to Z=0? On my own setup, I used MIN_Z_FOR_HOMING to prevent the nozzle from scraping the bed on the final G28 after MBL. But maybe I don't need that if all the G29 routines will leave the nozzle above the bed.

Side note: Since we have home_offset[Z_AXIS], any final move intended to be at the bed height should actually be to Z=home_offset[Z_AXIS], rather than to Z=0 anyway. (Haven't checked the code to see whether that is the case.)

@thinkyhead thinkyhead merged commit d0ac454 into MarlinFirmware:RCBugFix May 17, 2016
@jbrazio jbrazio deleted the bugfix/followup-3770 branch May 17, 2016 21:26
@jbrazio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbrazio commented May 17, 2016

Do we also have a PR (or want to extend this) to keep the nozzle where it is at the end of probing

I would say no.. it may cause us more problems than benefits.

@epatel
Copy link
Contributor

epatel commented May 17, 2016

Well, the reason for doing this reporting is to not having to move to [0,0,0]. So not adding that change seem confusing I think. I have a commit for this that @brainscan has agreed to test over here https://github.com/MarlinFirmware/MarlinDev/issues/162#issuecomment-219864846

@jbrazio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbrazio commented May 17, 2016

@epatel but that's is only related with MBL's G29 right ?
MBL is your domain I will not fight for it despite I believe no probing or homing should leave the nozzle touching the bed for obvious security reasons.

@epatel
Copy link
Contributor

epatel commented May 17, 2016

@jbrazio Yes it is for MBL only. There are request for both behaviors and I do not see this that dangerous, I have actually been using it like that for over a year. But again, I don't leave my hotend hot for long periods of time if I don't print with my printers. Also, if MBL is active it shouldn't drag across the bed as MBL should be compensating the bed as intended. If it is not active, well, then we are back to the discussion about having the endstop at the bed or above (which I consider a much more important security issue, but hey that new stuff is in so what can I do?)

Also, I set the default behavior to not do this move.

Well, I guess there are a lot of printers that have no bed leveling and have the Z endstop on the bed (I guess this would be pretty normal too)

@thinkyhead thinkyhead mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants