Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refining the grammar of the LengthComparison #221

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

fekad
Copy link
Contributor

@fekad fekad commented Dec 3, 2019

Closes #199

This PR has been made according to a previous issue (#199).

@fekad fekad added the PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing label Dec 3, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like this PR, because it simplifies the language. I want this PR to be in 1.0, because to go back and change something like this after we've released 1.0 is a horrible idea.

However, before I click 'approve', I want more people who are currently engaged in writing implementations to say that they agree, since this does force them to go back and change things that are already working for a mere syntax improvement.

I'm going to 'request review' on a few of them.

optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/inputs/length_fail.filter Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
merkys
merkys previously approved these changes Dec 4, 2019
Copy link
Member

@merkys merkys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To me this seems OK, and I'd be happy to have it merged ASAP.

Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(I'm making a blocking "request changes" review here, as I will urge others to approve the change and want to avoid accidental merging the changes until a few of those are in.)

CasperWA
CasperWA previously approved these changes Dec 4, 2019
Copy link
Member

@CasperWA CasperWA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me (as long as we ASAP update the grammar in optimade-python-tools 😉 ).
Thanks @fekad!

optimade.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@giovannipizzi
Copy link
Contributor

For me the change to the grammar is ok to be made - I'm not approving since anyway I see there are other changes requested, but happy to do if needed when all changes have been taken care of.

@rartino
Copy link
Contributor

rartino commented Dec 5, 2019

I think enough time has passed without protest to approve this. @fekad, can you please take a look at the suggested edits? At the very least, I agree with @CasperWA that it needs to be said somewhere in the specification that when the operator is omitted, LENGTH tests for equality.

@rartino rartino added PR/waiting-for-update This PR has been reviewed and is waiting for the author to response or update the PR and removed PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing labels Dec 5, 2019
@fekad fekad dismissed stale reviews from CasperWA and merkys via 895bc00 December 6, 2019 13:23
merkys
merkys previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2019
@CasperWA CasperWA added PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing and removed PR/waiting-for-update This PR has been reviewed and is waiting for the author to response or update the PR labels Dec 8, 2019
Copy link
Member

@CasperWA CasperWA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some clarifications desired. Mainly for the sentence I put in a suggested change for. Otherwise, I would say this is good-to-go.

optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@CasperWA CasperWA added PR/waiting-for-update This PR has been reviewed and is waiting for the author to response or update the PR and removed PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing labels Dec 8, 2019
Co-Authored-By: Casper Welzel Andersen <43357585+CasperWA@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One reformulation, otherwise good to go.

optimade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Rickard Armiento <gitcommits@armiento.net>
@fekad fekad added PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing and removed PR/waiting-for-update This PR has been reviewed and is waiting for the author to response or update the PR labels Dec 10, 2019
Copy link
Member

@CasperWA CasperWA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cheers @fekad. And thanks for patiently responding to our (my) many questions 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@rartino rartino merged commit 4c6c865 into develop Dec 11, 2019
@merkys merkys deleted the issue_199_length_comarison branch December 12, 2019 07:19
merkys added a commit to Materials-Consortia/OPTIMADE-Filter that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2019
CasperWA added a commit to CasperWA/optimade-python-tools that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2019
CasperWA added a commit to Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
CasperWA added a commit to Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
CasperWA added a commit to Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
CasperWA added a commit to Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
CasperWA added a commit to Materials-Consortia/optimade-python-tools that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refining the grammar of the LengthComparison
5 participants