New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Package structure #72
Comments
To keep the versions and the specs align (without matching the versions of the release, the pypi and the specification) the optimade repo can be added as a submodule: |
Is the support of multiple versions of the grammar is necessary? As far as I understand, all the releases planned to be tied to the version of the specification, isn't it? |
This I completely agree with, and have also been close to doing on a whim.
Also something that can easily just be done. I don't think anyone will have any objections if this was deftly included as a separate commit in a PR (or for best practices in a separate PR that only deals with reordering). |
Not a bad idea, but also not sure that this is necessary and may just clutter up the package a bit. |
As per your comment here, I do not agree. Also, the comment that we need to keep the versioning of this package be equal to the spec if we keep in all the grammars doesn't sound right to me. Indeed I would expect this to be more important if we always only keep the newest grammar, since there will be no other way of knowing which grammar version you are getting from this package other than having the version match the spec.
I am not completely sure what you mean by this, mostly how you would handle different versions through class inheritance. |
images
folder and relative path can be used in the markdown.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: