New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
restrict pydantic version #97
restrict pydantic version #97
Conversation
Happy to merge this as soon as the tests pass, then we can open a PR to upgrade pydantic/fastapi |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #97 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.83% 85.74% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 38 38
Lines 2315 2315
==========================================
- Hits 1987 1985 -2
- Misses 328 330 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Ahem... what's up with codecov? |
Anyhow, at least one of the codecov jobs is happy ;-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What would need to be changed for us to support pydantic>1? I know they
changed some of their API
…On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:01, Leopold Talirz ***@***.***> wrote:
Merged #97
<#97>
into master.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#97?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAWWWRD4EQMLGEOQSVP5SB3QV6XHDA5CNFSM4JSTK7IKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWZEXG43VMVCXMZLOORHG65DJMZUWGYLUNFXW5KTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOVEZW5FA#event-2838720148>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWWWRDXJDPBIRBQHPXKT5LQV6XHDANCNFSM4JSTK7IA>
.
|
Probably some redefining of validators and reconsidering all imports from I have already created an issue (#101) to discuss it and close, when an appropriate PR handles the upgrade. I would see it as a huge benefit to the repo to update it ASAP. However, I feel we need to deal with the current PRs first. |
fix #96