Bump eslint from 4.19.1 to 7.22.0 in /webrtc/tools #4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![dependabot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/29110?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Bumps [eslint](https://github.com/eslint/eslint) from 4.19.1 to 7.22.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](eslint/eslint@v4.19.1...v7.22.0) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
bot
added
dependencies
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
dependabot
bot
deleted the
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/webrtc/tools/eslint-7.22.0
branch
MattiasBuelens
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2021
…eVisibilityKeeper::PrepareToSplitBlockElement()` before splitting a text node It does the following things when caret is collapsed in a text node in a `<p>` or `<div>` element. 1. Split the text node containing caret to insert `<br>` element 2. Insert `<br>` element after it 3. Split ancestor elements which inclusive descendants of the `<p>` or `<div>` 4. Delete the `<br>` element if unnecessary from the left paragraph #3 and #4 are performed by `HTMLEditor::SplitParagraph()` and it calls `WhiteSpaceVisibilityKeeper::PrepareToSplitBlockElement()` correctly before splitting the block. However, in the case (caret is at middle of a text node), the text has already been split to 2 nodes because of #1. Therefore, it fails to handle to keep the white-space visibility. So that I believe that the root cause of this bug is, the method does much complicated things which are required, and doing the redundant things will eat memory space due to undo transactions. However, for now, I'd like to fix this with a simple patch which just call the preparation method before splitting the text node because I'd like to uplift this if it'd be approved (Note that this is not a recent regression, the root cause was created by bug 92686 which was fixed in 17 years ago: <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/commit/2e66280faef73e9be218e00758d4eb738395ac83>, but must be annoying bug for users who see this frequently). The new WPTs are pass in Chrome. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D130950 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416 gecko-commit: 73567f6c2bcfa078836a36760498bb11747561dd gecko-reviewers: m_kato, smaug
MattiasBuelens
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2023
This CL improves the testing of template cloning with Parts, testing these four cases: 1. Main document parsing 2. Template (content fragment) parsing 3. Template/fragment cloning 4. Declarative Shadow DOM parsing and cloning This CL fixes the behavior for #3 above, but leaves #4 broken. The following changes in behavior are made: 1. Part::MoveToRoot() can be used to change the root(), including to set it to nullptr. This happens when a Node tree is removed from the DOM, and it contains Parts that refer to the old root. 2. IsDocumentPartRoot() is now virtual, because during a tree move, the root() for a Part can be made nullptr even when it's a ChildNodePart. 3. Part::disconnected_ is added to keep track of whether the Part has been disconnected, since root() can now be nullptr. 4. (This is a bug fix) When using ChildNodePart::setNextSibling(), the new sibling node wasn't having its Part registered with NodeRareData, which caused a CHECK failure when trying to subsequently clone that Part. This is caught in the new test which clones declaratively-built templates containing Parts. Bug: 1453291 Change-Id: Ic1c1475431cf6bd658f191db78003204412ef78f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4713668 Reviewed-by: David Baron <dbaron@chromium.org> Auto-Submit: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1175782}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps eslint from 4.19.1 to 7.22.0.
Release notes
Sourced from eslint's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from eslint's changelog.
... (truncated)
Commits
6ee80377.22.0a55e8a1Build: changelog update for 7.22.03a432d8Docs: Improve documentation for indent rule (#14168)f62ec8dUpdate: throw error when fix range is invalid (#14142)0eecad2Upgrade: Update lodash in package.json to V 4.17.21 (#14159)5ad91aaUpdate: report es2021 globals in no-extend-native (refs #13602) (#14177)c295581Chore: remove leftover JSDoc from lint-result-cache (#14176)0d541f9Chore: Reduce lodash usage (#14178)27a67d7Sponsors: Sync README with website459d821Chore: upgrade dependencies of browser test (#14127)Maintainer changes
This version was pushed to npm by eslintbot, a new releaser for eslint since your current version.
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)