Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignoring erroneous scan folder contents / or exit with error message #264

Open
digitensions opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 5 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request NeedSponsor

Comments

@digitensions
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, following the twitter chat I'm submitting an issue that requests a feature which 'ignores' an erroneous item in a RAWcooked folder. For example, each folder scanned at MACE comes with a weird 'perftest.raw' sidecar which I have to delete prior to successful cooking. It's only a couple of KB in size, so should slip through the net but always trips up the process. Also could be useful for files that fall into the stream by accident... it can happen (to me!)

Would it be possible for the software to flag this additional file, or exit with an error message that hints at the cause?

Many thanks,
Joanna

@JeromeMartinez
Copy link
Member

Do I understand correctly if I say that you would need either or both:

  • a black list (ignore/exit if file name is in a list)
  • a white list (ignore/exit if file name is not in a list and obviously is not an A/V content)

@digitensions
Copy link
Contributor Author

How would you propose defining a list? User suggestions? I assume any GE4 users are getting this perftest.raw file - so that would be one for it.

Either/or suits me - whatever seems practical for broad use :)

@JeromeMartinez
Copy link
Member

How would you propose defining a list? User suggestions?

User choice on command line and/or in config.
But it would also be possible to add templates done by users if useful.

@JeromeMartinez JeromeMartinez added enhancement New feature or request NeedSponsor labels Sep 25, 2019
@digitensions
Copy link
Contributor Author

That sounds great! In config particularly. We don't need to retain this perftest.raw, but it's a major pain clearing it out of the way everytime. Templates sounds cool too! 👍

@stephenmcconnachie
Copy link
Contributor

stephenmcconnachie commented Sep 25, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request NeedSponsor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants