Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mass Drivers use more slots than shown #655

Closed
UB-JM opened this issue Jun 19, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #672
Closed

Mass Drivers use more slots than shown #655

UB-JM opened this issue Jun 19, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #672

Comments

@UB-JM
Copy link

UB-JM commented Jun 19, 2020

Environment

MekLab 0.47.5
Windows 10 Pro N, newest update at the time of writing
Java version 1.8.0_241

Description

I am trying to build a warship with a mass driver (I know, I need help).
In the current ship (picture attached), the ship's nose has 10 slots used, and everything behaves as expected up until I add a 12th weapon to the arc, at which point it increases the firecontrol weight.
My most likely explanation is that the Mass Driver counts as 10 slots used, which is consistent with the weight not going up when adding the 21st weapon. However, it does list it as 12/20 instead of 21/40 weapons, so the description and calculation do not match.
I haven't found any construction rule saying that a Mass Driver counts as 10 weapons, but just assuming it does, it would be nice if that was reflected in the UI somehow.

Files

Provide the megameklablog.txt file for any NPE's or errors that MekLab might be reporting.
Do not paste the entire logfile text into this ticket. Just attach the actual megameklablog.txt file
And provide the unit's file that the issue relates to if this is a unit-specific bug.
(Delete the above lines)
image
image

@neoancient
Copy link
Member

See the construction rules for mass drivers, TO p. 322.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants