Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use hash of updated lock files in branch name #201

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member

This prevents the workflow failing when the previous update branch hasn't been merged. It was finding the branch already existed on the remote and failing.

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 5, 2023
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo self-assigned this Oct 5, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Coverage

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added the small Small issue that should be quick to resolve label Oct 9, 2023
This prevents the workflow failing when the previous branch hasn't
been merged. It was finding the branch already existed on the
remote and failing.
@jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member Author

Runner pinned to python 3.11 to avoid conda/conda-lock#542

@jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member Author

Bypassing review as this same change has bee reviewed in https://github.com/MetOffice/BleSS_UK/pull/129 and https://github.com/MetOffice/BleSS_UK/pull/131

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo merged commit c7905a0 into main Nov 7, 2023
5 checks passed
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo deleted the conda-lock-update-fix branch November 7, 2023 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working small Small issue that should be quick to resolve
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant