Remove inactive IPFS gateways

[NicholasEllul]

Development & PR Process

1. Follow MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards
2. Add release-xx label to identify the PR slated for a upcoming release (will be used in release discussion)
3. Add needs-dev-review label when work is completed
4. Add needs-qa label when dev review is completed
5. Add QA Passed label when QA has signed off

Description
This pull request removes IPFS gateways which are no longer up and serving over HTTPs. This is to clear out stale records which are no longer relevant to the MetaMask Mobile Application. I did not remove records for IPFS providers which were still up, but returned an incorrect response when testing if they were active.

Issue

https://github.com/MetaMask/mobile-planning/issues/766

Checklist

• There is a related GitHub issue
• Tests are included if applicable
• Any added code is fully documented

For reviewers

Visit each provider and view that it is down.

List with clickable links for all downed providers

{
"value": "https://rx14.co.uk/ipfs/",
"key": 3,
"label": "https://rx14.co.uk/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ninetailed.ninja/ipfs/",
"key": 4,
"label": "https://ninetailed.ninja/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://upload.global/ipfs/",
"key": 5,
"label": "https://upload.global/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.jes.xxx/ipfs/",
"key": 6,
"label": "https://ipfs.jes.xxx/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://catalunya.network/ipfs/",
"key": 7,
"label": "https://catalunya.network/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://siderus.io/ipfs/",
"key": 8,
"label": "https://siderus.io/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.eternum.io/ipfs/",
"key": 9,
"label": "https://ipfs.eternum.io/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.macholibre.org/ipfs/",
"key": 11,
"label": "https://ipfs.macholibre.org/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.works/ipfs/",
"key": 12,
"label": "https://ipfs.works/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.wa.hle.rs/ipfs/",
"key": 13,
"label": "https://ipfs.wa.hle.rs/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://api.wisdom.sh/ipfs/",
"key": 14,
"label": "https://api.wisdom.sh/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://gateway.blocksec.com/ipfs/",
"key": 15,
"label": "https://gateway.blocksec.com/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.renehsz.com/ipfs/",
"key": 16,
"label": "https://ipfs.renehsz.com/ipfs/"
},
{ "value": "https://ipns.co/", "key": 18, "label": "https://ipns.co/" },
{
"value": "https://ipfs.netw0rk.io/ipfs/",
"key": 19,
"label": "https://ipfs.netw0rk.io/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://gateway.swedneck.xyz/ipfs/",
"key": 20,
"label": "https://gateway.swedneck.xyz/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.mrh.io/ipfs/",
"key": 21,
"label": "https://ipfs.mrh.io/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://gateway.originprotocol.com/ipfs/",
"key": 22,
"label": "https://gateway.originprotocol.com/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.dapps.earth/ipfs/",
"key": 23,
"label": "https://ipfs.dapps.earth/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.doolta.com/ipfs/",
"key": 25,
"label": "https://ipfs.doolta.com/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.sloppyta.co/ipfs/",
"key": 26,
"label": "https://ipfs.sloppyta.co/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.busy.org/ipfs/",
"key": 27,
"label": "https://ipfs.busy.org/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://gateway.serph.network/ipfs/",
"key": 29,
"label": "https://gateway.serph.network/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://jorropo.ovh/ipfs/",
"key": 30,
"label": "https://jorropo.ovh/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://ipfs.deo.moe/ipfs/",
"key": 31,
"label": "https://ipfs.deo.moe/ipfs/"
},
{
"value": "https://gateway.temporal.cloud/ipfs/",
"key": 32,
"label": "https://gateway.temporal.cloud/ipfs/"
},

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[legobeat]

lgtm

[NicholasEllul]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[sethkfman]

LGTM

[sethkfman]

@chrisleewilcox @cortisiko This seems like a No QA needed/Smoke test in regression ticket. It just removes a few IPFS URLs in the IPFS list.

[cortisiko]

@sethkfman Sounds safe enough for a smoke test. 👍 cc @chrisleewilcox @NicholasEllul