-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: remove outdated ipfs gateways #6962
Conversation
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
@jpcloureiro Could you provide videos demonstrating the last two scenarios in the acceptance criteria? |
Make sure we return the same state if ...PreferencesController or ...PreferencesController.ipfsGateway happen to be undefined for some reason
https://recordit.co/nJruefTBl1
https://recordit.co/OnMq5d33VF They're also represented by the unit tests |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6962 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 32.73% 32.75% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 993 993
Lines 26614 26620 +6
Branches 2083 2083
==========================================
+ Hits 8713 8719 +6
Misses 17487 17487
Partials 414 414
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
39dc67f
to
f059646
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs 100.0% Coverage The version of Java (11.0.20) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ ✅
Development & PR Process
release-xx
label to identify the PR slated for a upcoming release (will be used in release discussion)needs-dev-review
label when work is completedneeds-qa
: PR requires manual QA.No QA/E2E only
: PR does not require any manual QA effort. Prior to merging, ensure that you have successful end-to-end test runs in Bitrise.Spot check on release build
: PR does not require feature QA but needs non-automated verification. In the description section, provide test scenarios. Add screenshots, and or recordings of what was tested.QA Passed
label when QA has signed off (Only required if the PR was labeled withneeds-qa
)team-
(orexternal-contributor
label if your not a MetaMask employee)Description
Remove outdated ipfs gateways from selectable list under advanced settings
migrate users from outdated ipfs gateways URLs to the default one
Issue
fixes https://github.com/MetaMask/mobile-planning/issues/1152
Checklist