refactor: Update ListItem based on latest design

[brianacnguyen]

Description

• Moved padding and borderRadius to style
• Updated default verticalAlignment to center

Screenshots/Recordings

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
• I've linked related issues
• I've included manual testing steps
• I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
• I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
  • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (cb37fdf) 35.10% compared to head (b3c5c9d) 35.09%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7739      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.10%   35.09%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1035     1035              
  Lines       27529    27526       -3     
  Branches     2313     2311       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         9664     9661       -3     
  Misses      17345    17345              
  Partials      520      520              

Files	Coverage Δ
...ary/components/List/ListItem/ListItem.constants.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rary/components/List/ListItem/ListItem.stories.tsx	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ibrary/components/List/ListItem/ListItem.styles.ts	70.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nent-library/components/List/ListItem/ListItem.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
1 Code Smell

100.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

[tommasini]

Hey Brian amazing work, can you record a video of the permissions components? I can see that this impacts the permissions sheets for connecting one or multiple accounts to a dapp

[brianacnguyen]

Hey Brian amazing work, can you record a video of the permissions components? I can see that this impacts the permissions sheets for connecting one or multiple accounts to a dapp

done

[tommasini]

LGTM! Please merge it after the E2E pass please!

[github-actions]

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/0de758d0-90f9-4a41-891b-65bfa0193d13
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label