Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update e2e regression casing #7810

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

chore: Update e2e regression casing #7810

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

Cal-L
Copy link
Contributor

@Cal-L Cal-L commented Nov 14, 2023

Description

This is meant to make the testNamePattern more accurate since the code tags with title case Regression & Smoke

Related issues

Fixes: #

Manual testing steps

  1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

  • I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
  • I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
  • I've linked related issues
  • I've included manual testing steps
  • I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
  • I’ve included tests if applicable
  • I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
  • I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
  • I’ve properly set the pull request status:
    • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
    • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

@Cal-L Cal-L requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2023 19:41
Copy link
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@Cal-L Cal-L added No QA Needed/E2E Only Apply this label when your PR does not need any QA effort. Run Smoke E2E labels Nov 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/fd1eeca8-1574-49f2-963b-69d790746f32
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 14, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ca5a673) 35.04% compared to head (66f5c4b) 35.04%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7810   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.04%   35.04%           
=======================================
  Files        1040     1040           
  Lines       27710    27710           
  Branches     2344     2344           
=======================================
  Hits         9711     9711           
  Misses      17475    17475           
  Partials      524      524           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/ac263a91-6033-470f-98c3-59dcbfefc662
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

@metamaskbot metamaskbot added ready-for-dev needs-dev-review PR needs reviews from other engineers (in order to receive required approvals) and removed ready-for-dev labels Nov 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/10ff36bd-6062-4244-8444-57a158eb5569
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 16, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Contributor

@chrisleewilcox chrisleewilcox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Cal-L Cal-L merged commit d81d0be into main Nov 16, 2023
31 checks passed
@Cal-L Cal-L deleted the fix/e2e-tags branch November 16, 2023 17:54
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 16, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the needs-dev-review PR needs reviews from other engineers (in order to receive required approvals) label Nov 16, 2023
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the release-7.12.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.12.0 label Nov 16, 2023
Copy link
Member

@cortisiko cortisiko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for addressing.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
No QA Needed/E2E Only Apply this label when your PR does not need any QA effort. release-7.12.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.12.0 team-mobile-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants