test: Batch 4 Remove all instances of strings in TestID property in the app code

[SamuelSalas]

Description

Replace all string definitions used for testIDs. These files should no longer selector strings in the TestID prop:

• app/components/Views/AccountBackupStep1/index.js
• app/components/Views/AccountBackupStep1B/index.js
• app/components/Views/AddAsset/AddAsset.tsx
• app/components/Views/AddBookmark/index.js
• app/components/Views/AddressQRCode/index.js
• app/components/Views/ChoosePassword/index.js
• app/components/Views/Collectible/index.js

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Smoke test run: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/6cb82fee-c55a-4c6b-a5a6-926eba229dd0
Regression test run: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/ef0b5a0b-171b-4819-ad4b-7f598fee427b
Appium test run: https://app.bitrise.io/build/39801a05-be41-4010-9c6c-8ef85b26b732

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
• I've linked related issues
• I've included manual testing steps
• I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
• I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
  • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d7869a6) 38.90% compared to head (42cee99) 38.90%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8014   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.90%   38.90%           
=======================================
  Files        1198     1198           
  Lines       29729    29729           
  Branches     2829     2829           
=======================================
  Hits        11566    11566           
  Misses      17479    17479           
  Partials      684      684           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/b7f7829c-ea0b-44c5-b2ff-23a902b537b0
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

[cortisiko]

left a few comments @SamuelSalas

[github-actions]

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/6cb82fee-c55a-4c6b-a5a6-926eba229dd0
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

4.9% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud