-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: split the Connection class into smaller chunks and add unit tests #8074
chore: split the Connection class into smaller chunks and add unit tests #8074
Conversation
…to-SDKConnect-handlers
…to-SDKConnect-handlers
…_split-the-SDKConnect-class-into-smaller-chunks
…_split-the-SDKConnect-class-into-smaller-chunks
…'[object global]' error
…to-SDKConnect-handlers
…_split-the-SDKConnect-class-into-smaller-chunks
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8074 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 38.90% 39.27% +0.36%
==========================================
Files 1198 1208 +10
Lines 29729 29738 +9
Branches 2829 2828 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 11566 11679 +113
+ Misses 17479 17371 -108
- Partials 684 688 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The base branch was changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Eventually we need to finalize a naming convention and enforce it via linters
…ction-class-into-smaller-chunks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Quality Gate passedThe SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced. 2 New issues |
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Next stepsWhat is a deprecated package?The maintainer of the package marked it as deprecated. This could indicate that a single version should not be used, or that the package is no longer maintained and any new vulnerabilities will not be fixed. Research the state of the package and determine if there are non-deprecated versions that can be used, or if it should be replaced with a new, supported solution. What is a potential typo squat?Package name is similar to other popular packages and may not be the package you want. Use care when consuming similarly named packages and ensure that you did not intend to consume a different package. Malicious packages often publish using similar names as existing popular packages. Take a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with
|
Tests on iOS and Android:
|
Description
Split the Connection class into smaller chunks to make the code more testable and add unit tests.
Related issues
Fixes:
Manual testing steps
Screenshots/Recordings
Before
After
Pre-merge author checklist
Pre-merge reviewer checklist