feat: Feature/1300 dapp visit event

[Cal-L]

Description

This change tracks a new event named Dapp Visited under the four conditions listed in the original ticket

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

Referencing the video below:
Dapp visited event should be triggered when:

• Connecting to a dapp when no accounts are connected
• Reloading a dapp that already has connected accounts
• Navigating to another dapp with existing connected accounts

Original scenarios here - https://github.com/MetaMask/mobile-planning/issues/1300#:~:text=the%20first%20connection.-,Scenario,-Scenario%3A%20Dapp

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

This video show cases all of the scenarios listed in the original ticket

Screen.Recording.2024-02-08.at.10.21.39.PM.mov

On Mixpanel

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
• I've linked related issues
• I've included manual testing steps
• I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
• I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
  • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/e3785a81-ea28-4185-888e-33e108feb85a
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (8ec9970) 41.08% compared to head (e7b542a) 41.08%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
app/components/Views/BrowserTab/index.js	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...components/Views/AccountConnect/AccountConnect.tsx	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
app/reducers/browser/index.js	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8520      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.08%   41.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1245     1246       +1     
  Lines       30330    30355      +25     
  Branches     2962     2962              
==========================================
+ Hits        12462    12471       +9     
- Misses      17125    17141      +16     
  Partials      743      743              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Cal-L]

Added notes

[MarioAslau]

Looks good! Left a question

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
31.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud