feat: Assets controllers update to version 10

[tommasini]

Description

Update assets controllers to version 10

Added script to make easier update the next versions of assets-controllers

Core branch with changes: patch/mobile-assets-controllers-v10 : https://github.com/MetaMask/core/tree/patch/mobile-assets-controllers-v10

Still missing recordings of exploratory testing

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Token exploration: https://recordit.co/jiLNME568H
NFT exploration: https://recordit.co/QtOD9Gw1Va
Add token via dapp: https://recordit.co/t22cGKhdmG

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
• I've linked related issues
• I've included manual testing steps
• I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
• I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
  • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[socket-security]

👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

View full report↗︎

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.63%. Comparing base (f743ea0) to head (eb5b7bd).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8778   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.63%   41.63%           
=======================================
  Files        1270     1270           
  Lines       30887    30887           
  Branches     3083     3083           
=======================================
+ Hits        12859    12860    +1     
+ Misses      17250    17249    -1     
  Partials      778      778           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

🔄🔄🔄 pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline started on Bitrise...🔄🔄🔄

Commit hash: 8dc40f0
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/d848c703-6c1e-4dc5-b267-67e78b2f6c00

Note

• This comment will auto-update when build completes
• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[socket-security]

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/@metamask/assets-controllers@10.0.0	Transitive: environment, filesystem, network	+142	33.4 MB	metamaskbot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@metamask/assets-controllers@9.2.0, npm/zxcvbn@4.4.2

View full report↗︎

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: f61980e
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/0e341b8b-8a55-480c-a7a9-d57dec5c71bf

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[Cal-L]

LGTM

[Cal-L]

LGTM

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: eb5b7bd
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/d8ab2bf3-1aca-4e45-9e18-21892dfc0769

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud