You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Use-case: running nixpkgs-review with config.cudaSupport = true and custom config.cudaCapabilities.
Currently, nixpkgs-review only tracks affected cuda-enabled packages if they expose a xxxWithCuda attribute in nixpkgs.
Not all packages do that, and it's debatable whether they should.
I think a satisfiable solution would be e.g. being able to run nixpkgs-review pr XXXXXX --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ config.cudaSupport = true; }'. I imagine nixpkgs-review could explicitly state any extra options it has received in the report that it publishes as a github comment, since these options could (and do) affect the eval
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use-case: running
nixpkgs-review
withconfig.cudaSupport = true
and customconfig.cudaCapabilities
.Currently,
nixpkgs-review
only tracks affected cuda-enabled packages if they expose axxxWithCuda
attribute in nixpkgs.Not all packages do that, and it's debatable whether they should.
I think a satisfiable solution would be e.g. being able to run
nixpkgs-review pr XXXXXX --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ config.cudaSupport = true; }'
. I imaginenixpkgs-review
could explicitly state any extra options it has received in the report that it publishes as a github comment, since these options could (and do) affect the evalThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: