Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: ranges for datetime, better contains, intersection, union, transition #19

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Sep 14, 2022
Merged

feat: ranges for datetime, better contains, intersection, union, transition #19

merged 8 commits into from Sep 14, 2022

Conversation

MicaelJarniac
Copy link
Owner

@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac commented Sep 8, 2022 •
edited

Closes #18.

Related to #12, #13.

@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac self-assigned this Sep 8, 2022
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 8, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2022 •
edited

Codecov Report

Merging #19 (820858b) into develop (e9c19b9) will increase coverage by 7.59%.
The diff coverage is 66.09%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #19      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    63.82%   71.42%   +7.59%     
===========================================
  Files            2        4       +2     
  Lines           94      301     +207     
===========================================
+ Hits            60      215     +155     
- Misses          34       86      +52
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 71.42% <66.09%> (+7.59%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/timeranges/_datetimeranges.py 51.21% <51.21%> (ø)
src/timeranges/_timeranges.py 84.79% <81.90%> (+22.15%) ⬆️
src/timeranges/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/timeranges/_base.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac changed the base branch from main to develop September 8, 2022 16:45
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac changed the title Better contains that supports more types Ranges for datetime, better contains that supports more types Sep 14, 2022
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac changed the title Ranges for datetime, better contains that supports more types Ranges for datetime, better contains, intersection, union, transition Sep 14, 2022
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac changed the title Ranges for datetime, better contains, intersection, union, transition feat: ranges for datetime, better contains, intersection, union, transition Sep 14, 2022
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2022 20:14
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac merged commit 7521f1d into develop Sep 14, 2022
@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac deleted the MicaelJarniac/issue18 branch September 14, 2022 20:15
MicaelJarniac added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2022
@MicaelJarniac
feat: ranges for datetime, better contains, intersection, union, …
0020582 
…transition (#19) (#20)

Closes #18.

Related to #12, #13.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@MicaelJarniac MicaelJarniac

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
1 participant
@MicaelJarniac