Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore success patterns case when matching #594

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 17, 2017

Conversation

itoys
Copy link
Contributor

@itoys itoys commented Nov 17, 2017

Resolves #586

@itoys itoys changed the title Ignore patterns case when matching Ignore success patterns case when matching Nov 17, 2017
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 17, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #594 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #594      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   15.59%   15.58%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          61       61              
  Lines        3026     3028       +2     
  Branches      370      370              
==========================================
  Hits          472      472              
- Misses       2554     2556       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/common/outputVerifier.ts 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/extension/extensionServer.ts 3.07% <0%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bb86934...09221f9. Read the comment docs.

@svekl
Copy link
Contributor

svekl commented Nov 17, 2017

@itoys LGTM

@itoys itoys merged commit e03193a into master Nov 17, 2017
@itoys itoys deleted the bugfix/success-patterns-matching branch November 17, 2017 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants