Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FWord capitalization #764

Closed
simoncozens opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

FWord capitalization #764

simoncozens opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@simoncozens
Copy link

simoncozens commented Apr 19, 2021

The post table has

FWord underlinePosition This is the suggested distance of the top of the underline from the baseline (negative values indicate below baseline).The PostScript definition of this FontInfo dictionary key (the y coordinate of the center of the stroke) is not used for historical reasons. The value of the PostScript key may be calculated by subtracting half the underlineThickness from the value of this field.
FWord underlineThickness Suggested values for the underline thickness. In general, the underline thickness should match the thickness of the underscore character (U+005F LOW LINE), and should also match the strikeout thickness, which is specified in the OS/2 table.

The correct data type is

FWORD | int16 that describes a quantity in font design units.


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@vlevantovsky
Copy link

There is one more occurrence of the same spelling in the description of the 'kern' table, might as well fix them all while we are at it.

@B-starboy
Copy link

That'll work

@PeterCon PeterCon self-assigned this Jun 1, 2021
@PeterCon PeterCon added this to the OpenType 1.9 milestone Nov 10, 2021
@PeterCon
Copy link
Collaborator

PeterCon commented Dec 9, 2021

Addressed in OpenType 1.9. Closing.

@PeterCon PeterCon closed this as completed Dec 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants