New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AppLocker PowerShell reference update #2623
AppLocker PowerShell reference update #2623
Conversation
Docs Build status updates of commit f785606: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:
|
Getting feedback on new text now. |
Docs Build status updates of commit 06509e3: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:
|
Text approved by product team in email. Ready for review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copy review.
@tiburd - This is ready for review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as my comment
|
||
```yaml | ||
Type: SwitchParameter | ||
Parameter Sets: FileInformation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if adding two yaml blocks under the parameter is the correct way or specifying
Parameter Sets: (All)
like other cmdlet articles do, I do know that one specifies required true and the other false... @dariomws @tseward ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. Maybe the best way is using Parameter Sets: (All)
. And looking over the other example it seems that this parameter is not required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with @get-itips.
Docs Build status updates of commit 7f4aec5: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:
|
Docs Build status updates of commit d4ae35b: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:
|
1871144
I updated an example to use the new param. I didn't follow guidance on omitting the prompt (or make any other changes to the example) for consistency with the other two examples.