We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think it could be really cool to have an MLJ integration for SymbolicRegression. As an example of how it could be used, in https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-sirus-jl-v1-2-interpretable-machine-learning-via-rule-extraction/100932/2 I compared SymbolicRegression to SIRUS for performing interpretable regression on a basic ML example dataset (Boston housing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sure, sounds like a great idea! What methods do we need to write to interface it? And I guess it would go in ext/?
ext/
Sorry, something went wrong.
Potentially fixed by #226
Generally, only MLJModelInterface.jl is needed and it is very light. I think making it a hard dependency should be fine.
Merge tag 'v0.20.0' into units4
8b4efa0
[Diff since v0.19.1](v0.19.1...v0.20.0) **Closed issues:** - [Feature]: MLJ integration (#225) - [Feature]: ternary operators (#227) **Merged pull requests:** - MLJ Integration (#226) (@MilesCranmer)
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Feature Request
I think it could be really cool to have an MLJ integration for SymbolicRegression. As an example of how it could be used, in https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-sirus-jl-v1-2-interpretable-machine-learning-via-rule-extraction/100932/2 I compared SymbolicRegression to SIRUS for performing interpretable regression on a basic ML example dataset (Boston housing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: