feat: Update Notice source code such that field name comments match documentation in RULES.md

[bdferris-v2]

As part of our effort to alignment documentation and source code in #1324, this PR applies an automated transform to update the comments of each Notice field in source to match the equivalent field documentation string from RULES.md. This gets us one step closer to generating RULES.md from source code directly.

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

• Run the unit tests with gradle test to make sure you didn't break anything
• Format the title like "feat: [new feature short description]". Title must follow the Conventional Commit Specification(https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/).
• Linked all relevant issues

[bdferris-v2]

@isabelle-dr I know this review looks a little bit scary, but it's largely an automated transformation from RULES.md to source code. As always, curious what you think.

[github-actions]

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1419 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1419 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1419 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: 88309a4
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

[briandonahue]

@bdferris-v2 in looking at this for #1289 I noticed some copy/paste mistakes where row number comment was copied for file name field, so I fixed those.

[bdferris-v2]

@briandonahue those are actually errors in the source RULES.md file :) But fixing them here is appreciated, thanks!

[isabelle-dr]

Hey @bdferris-v2, sorry for the late answer, and thank you for this first step in the direction of a programmatically generated doc!
This LGTM.
We should keep in mind that as we work on this, all new ...Notice.java and ...Validator.java files that add new notices will need to include this syntax.

[isabelle-dr]

After the conflicts are resolved, I think we're good to merge this PR!
cc @davidgamez

[github-actions]

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1423 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: 8bd87fd
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.