Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add @GtfsValidationNotice annotations to all notice classes #1366

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 28, 2023

Conversation

bdferris-v2
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary:

This is an automated transform of the existing source code, extracting documentation references from RULES.md where appropriate. This part of #1324 and our effort to generate documentation from source code.

This PR also includes a small change to @GtfsValidationNotice itself to handle GTFS reference section links.

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Run the unit tests with gradle test to make sure you didn't break anything
  • Format the title like "feat: [new feature short description]". Title must follow the Conventional Commit Specification(https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/).
  • Linked all relevant issues
  • Include screenshot(s) showing how this pull request works and fixes the issue(s)

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1423 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1423 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: 0c20dc3
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1426 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: bad825d
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

Copy link
Member

@davidgamez davidgamez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@davidgamez davidgamez merged commit 423086f into master Apr 28, 2023
333 checks passed
@davidgamez davidgamez deleted the issue/1324/rules branch April 28, 2023 23:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1426 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1426 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: 141109a
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants