Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Added a execution result file #1690

Merged

Conversation

jcpitre
Copy link
Contributor

@jcpitre jcpitre commented Mar 6, 2024

Summary:

closes #1688

Added execution_result.json file containing the result of the execution of the validation.
This file should be available at the same location as the report files (report.html, report.json, etc)
Typical contents of this file:

{
  "status": "error",
  "error": "Validation failed"
}

or

{
  "status": "success",
  "error": ""
}

Now the endpoint always return 200.

Testing tips

  • Deploy to staging
    • I added a manual trigger to .github/workflows/stg_web_svc_merge.yml but this will not be available until this branch is merged into master.
    • Meanwhile you can create your own branch and add a push to your branch trigger
    • You don't need to deploy the client.
  • On the staging client web page, select a good dataset and validate it. Open the report.
  • Replace report.html at the end of the report URL by execution_result.json. You should be able to load the file
  • Try gain with a broken dataset

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Run the unit tests with gradle test to make sure you didn't break anything
  • Add or update any needed documentation to the repo
  • Format the title like "feat: [new feature short description]". Title must follow the Conventional Commit Specification(https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/).
  • Linked all relevant issues
  • Include screenshot(s) showing how this pull request works and fixes the issue(s)

@jcpitre jcpitre linked an issue Mar 6, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1520 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: c7a2652
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

@jcpitre jcpitre marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2024 16:54
@jcpitre jcpitre changed the title Added result file. fix: Added a execution result file Mar 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2024

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 1 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1520 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: c03601e
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

@jcpitre jcpitre requested review from davidgamez and qcdyx March 8, 2024 13:48
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2024

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1520 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: dd3ad5b
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

@jcpitre jcpitre requested review from qcdyx and removed request for qcdyx March 8, 2024 14:48
Copy link
Contributor

@qcdyx qcdyx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2024

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1520 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: b03e243
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Warnings: 0 out of 1520 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1520 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: 8de55c9
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

@qcdyx qcdyx merged commit b537a1b into master Mar 10, 2024
282 checks passed
@qcdyx qcdyx deleted the 1688-create-execution_resultjson-file-for-web-validator-jobs branch March 10, 2024 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create execution_result.json file for web validator jobs
3 participants