[MOC-56] waiting until update finishes before showing rec list #70
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@NicoMorenoSirius has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes across multiple files in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Updated Sequence for Setting Editor ModesequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI as UI Component
participant Storage as chrome.storage.local
participant Utils as Utils Module
User->>UI: onClick event
UI->>Utils: loadRecordingId()
Utils-->>UI: recordingId
UI->>Utils: setEditorMode(false, recordingId)
UI->>Storage: Update MOCKSI_RECORDING_STATE
Storage-->>UI: Updated
UI->>UI: onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE)
Handle Close in EditToastsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant EditToast
participant Utils as Utils Module
participant Storage as chrome.storage.local
User->>EditToast: Trigger handleClose(true/false)
alt shouldSaveValues
EditToast->>Utils: loadRecordingId()
Utils-->>EditToast: recordingId
end
EditToast->>Utils: setEditorMode(false, recordingId)
Utils-->>EditToast: Done
EditToast->>Storage: Update MOCKSI_RECORDING_STATE
Storage-->>EditToast: Updated
EditToast->>EditToast: onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE)
Poem
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
NicoMorenoSirius
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/DemoItem.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/DemoItem.tsx
Additional comments not posted (4)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2)
102-104: Refactor: SimplifiedonKeyUpevent handler for "Escape" key.The refactoring removed redundant calls, streamlining the function. This should improve performance slightly and reduce the cognitive load when reading through the code. Again, ensure that this change does not affect other functionalities by conducting appropriate tests.
Line range hint
97-130: Refactor: SimplifiedonClickandonKeyUpevent handlers to improve sequence and readability.The updated
onClickandonKeyUphandlers now ensure that operations are performed in a logical order, which is particularly important for asynchronous operations. This change should make the code more predictable and easier to maintain. However, ensure that these changes are covered by unit tests, especially since they involve state changes and asynchronous operations.apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts (1)
Line range hint
23-34: Enhancement: EnsuredpersistModificationsis awaited and added a return statement.This change is crucial as it ensures that modifications are fully persisted before the function completes, which can prevent issues related to state inconsistency. The addition of the return statement explicitly indicates that the function has completed its execution, which can be useful for debugging and maintaining the code.
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (1)
73-83: Refactor: UpdatedpersistModificationsto be asynchronous and integrated withupdateRecordingsStorage.This change enhances the reliability of the modification persistence by ensuring that the storage update is completed asynchronously. It's important to ensure that this new asynchronous behavior is well-handled in all calling contexts to avoid unhandled promises.
Verification successful
All calls to
persistModificationshandle the promise correctly.The call to
persistModificationsineditMode.tsis properly awaited, ensuring that the asynchronous behavior is well-handled.
apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts: ThepersistModificationsfunction is awaited within thesetEditorModefunction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all calls to `persistModifications` handle the promise correctly. rg --type typescript 'persistModifications'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all calls to `persistModifications` handle the promise correctly. rg --type ts 'persistModifications'Length of output: 336
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the surrounding lines of the call to `persistModifications` in `editMode.ts` to verify proper handling of the promise. rg -A 5 -B 5 'persistModifications' apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.tsLength of output: 744
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | ||
| }} | ||
| onKeyUp={async (event) => { | ||
| if (event.key === "Enter") { | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | ||
| const recordingId = await loadRecordingId(); | ||
| setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | ||
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Unit tests are missing for the onKeyUp event handler in ContentApp.tsx.
To ensure the new logic is thoroughly tested, please add unit tests for the onKeyUp event handler in ContentApp.tsx. This will help verify that setEditorMode and onChangeState are correctly called after loadRecordingId.
- Add unit tests for the
onKeyUpevent handler inapps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx.
Analysis chain
Refactor: Modified onKeyUp event handler for "Enter" key.
This change ensures that setEditorMode and onChangeState are called after loadRecordingId, which is crucial for ensuring that the application's state is consistent with the backend data. This is a critical change and should be thoroughly tested.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if unit tests cover the new logic in onKeyUp handler for "Enter" key.
rg --type typescript -g '*test.ts' 'onKeyUp'
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the file type and re-verifying if unit tests cover the new logic in onKeyUp handler for "Enter" key.
rg --type ts -g '*test.ts' 'onKeyUp'
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of the onKeyUp event handler in the codebase.
rg 'onKeyUp' --type ts
# Search for test files to verify if the onKeyUp event handler is covered by tests.
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx test
Length of output: 999
| export const updateRecordingsStorage = async ({ | ||
| uuid, | ||
| updated_timestamp, | ||
| alterations, | ||
| }: { uuid: string; updated_timestamp: Date; alterations: Alteration[] }) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const recordingsFromStorage = await getRecordingsStorage(); | ||
| const modifiedRecordings = recordingsFromStorage.map((recording) => | ||
| recording.uuid === uuid | ||
| ? { ...recording, uuid, updated_timestamp, alterations } | ||
| : recording, | ||
| ); | ||
| const sorted = modifiedRecordings.sort((a: Recording, b: Recording) => | ||
| a.updated_timestamp > b.updated_timestamp ? -1 : 0, | ||
| ); | ||
| const recordingsStringified = JSON.stringify(sorted); | ||
| console.log("modified", recordingsFromStorage, sorted); | ||
| chrome.storage.local.set({ recordings: recordingsStringified }); | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| console.error("Failed to save modifications from LS:", err); | ||
| throw err; | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Unit tests for updateRecordingsStorage function are missing.
The search results indicate that the updateRecordingsStorage function is defined and used within apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts, but there are no references to it in any test files. This suggests that the function is not currently covered by unit tests.
- Ensure that unit tests are written for the
updateRecordingsStoragefunction to verify its behavior under various scenarios.
Analysis chain
New Feature: Added updateRecordingsStorage function to handle storage updates.
This addition is significant as it centralizes the logic for updating recordings in storage, which can improve maintainability and testing. The function also handles errors robustly, which is crucial for reliability. Ensure that this function is covered by unit tests to verify its behavior under various scenarios.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if unit tests cover the new `updateRecordingsStorage` function.
rg --type typescript -g '*test.ts' 'updateRecordingsStorage'
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if unit tests cover the new `updateRecordingsStorage` function.
rg --type ts -g '*test.ts' 'updateRecordingsStorage'
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all test files in the repository
fd --type f --extension ts --exec rg 'updateRecordingsStorage' {}
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all test files in the repository and their occurrences of `updateRecordingsStorage`
fd --type f --extension ts --exec rg --with-filename --line-number 'updateRecordingsStorage' {}
Length of output: 241
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (1)
42-43: Duplicate logic found.The logic in this
onKeyUphandler for the "Escape" key is identical to theonClickhandler logic. This duplication could be optimized by using the same function for both handlers, enhancing consistency and maintainability.
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consistent error handling and refactoring suggestion.
This onClick handler is similar to the previous handlers but lacks error handling. Apply the same error handling as suggested earlier and consider using the refactored function to handle this event.
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consistent error handling and refactoring suggestion.
The onKeyUp handler for the "Enter" key is another instance where the editor mode is set and the state is changed. This should also use the proposed refactored function to ensure consistency and error handling across all similar event handlers.
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure proper error handling in asynchronous calls.
The handleClose function now awaits the setEditorMode before changing the recording state. This is a good change for ensuring the sequence of operations, but it's crucial to handle potential errors that might arise from these asynchronous operations to prevent the UI from being in an inconsistent state.
- await setEditorMode(false, recordingId);
- onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE);
+ try {
+ await setEditorMode(false, recordingId);
+ onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to set editor mode:', error);
+ // Handle error appropriately here
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | |
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | |
| try { | |
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); | |
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to set editor mode:', error); | |
| // Handle error appropriately here | |
| } |
| onClick={() => { | ||
| setEditorMode(false); | ||
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor to remove redundant code.
The onClick handler here sets the editor mode to false and then changes the state to CREATE. This logic is repeated multiple times throughout the file. Consider refactoring this into a separate function to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.
+ const resetEditorAndChangeState = async () => {
+ try {
+ await setEditorMode(false);
+ onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error resetting editor and changing state:', error);
+ }
+ };
- onClick={() => {
- setEditorMode(false);
- onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE);
- }}
+ onClick={resetEditorAndChangeState}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| onClick={() => { | |
| setEditorMode(false); | |
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | |
| }} | |
| const resetEditorAndChangeState = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| await setEditorMode(false); | |
| onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Error resetting editor and changing state:', error); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| onClick={resetEditorAndChangeState} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/PlayToast.tsx (1)
Line range hint
7-20: Ensure proper error handling in asynchronous operations.The
handleEditfunction performs multiple asynchronous operations (getAlterations,loadAlterations,setEditorMode) but lacks error handling. This could lead to unhandled promise rejections if any of these operations fail.const handleEdit = async () => { try { const alterations = await getAlterations(); loadAlterations(alterations, true); await setEditorMode(true); onChangeState(RecordingState.EDITING); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to handle edit:', error); // Handle error appropriately, maybe set an error state or show a notification } };
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/PlayToast.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/PlayToast.tsx (2)
20-20: Consider awaiting potentially asynchronous operations.The
sendMessagefunction might be asynchronous. If it is, consider usingawaitto ensure it completes before proceeding to change the state and closing the toast.
42-45: EnsureundoModificationsis awaited if asynchronous.The
undoModificationsfunction is called within anonClickevent handler but it is not awaited. If this function is asynchronous, failing to await it could lead to state inconsistency.Verification successful
The function
undoModificationsis not asynchronous and does not need to be awaited.
undoModificationsis defined inapps/mocksi-lite/utils.tsand performs synchronous operations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if `undoModifications` is asynchronous and should be awaited. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Function is asynchronous. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'function undoModifications($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate all definitions of the `undoModifications` function to verify if it is asynchronous. # Search for the function definition using a broader search pattern. rg 'function undoModifications|const undoModifications|let undoModifications|var undoModifications|undoModifications = ' --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsx # Additionally, check if `undoModifications` is imported from another file. rg 'import {.*undoModifications.*} from' --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsxLength of output: 403
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate all definitions of the `undoModifications` function to verify if it is asynchronous. # Search for the function definition using a broader search pattern. rg 'function undoModifications|const undoModifications|let undoModifications|var undoModifications|undoModifications =' --type js --type ts --type tsx # Additionally, check if `undoModifications` is imported from another file. rg 'import {.*undoModifications.*} from' --type js --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 380
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate all definitions of the `undoModifications` function to verify if it is asynchronous. # Search for the function definition using a broader search pattern. rg 'function undoModifications|const undoModifications|let undoModifications|var undoModifications|undoModifications =' --type js --type ts # Additionally, check if `undoModifications` is imported from another file. rg 'import \{.*undoModifications.*\} from' --type js --type tsLength of output: 530
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the `undoModifications` function in `utils.ts` is asynchronous. # Search for the definition of `undoModifications` in `utils.ts`. rg 'export const undoModifications' apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts -A 5Length of output: 294
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/DemoItem.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Popup/CreateDemo/DemoItem.tsx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/PlayToast.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/PlayToast.tsx
| onClick={() => { | ||
| handleClose(false); | ||
| }} | ||
| onKeyUp={async (event) => { | ||
| if (event.key === "Escape") { | ||
| handleClose(); | ||
| handleClose(false); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor repetitive event handling logic.
The onClick and onKeyUp event handlers for different elements are calling the handleClose function with repetitive logic. This could be refactored into a separate function to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability. Additionally, consider using a single event handler for both onClick and onKeyUp where feasible.
+ const handleUserInteraction = (saveValues) => {
+ handleClose(saveValues);
+ };
- onClick={() => handleClose(false)}
- onKeyUp={async (event) => {
- if (event.key === "Escape") {
- handleClose(false);
- }
- }}
+ onClick={() => handleUserInteraction(false)}
+ onKeyUp={(event) => {
- if (event.key === "Escape") {
+ handleUserInteraction(false);
+ }
+ }}
- onClick={async () => handleClose(true)}
- onKeyUp={async (event) => {
- if (event.key === "Enter") {
- handleClose(true);
- }
- }}
+ onClick={() => handleUserInteraction(true)}
+ onKeyUp={(event) => {
- if (event.key === "Enter") {
+ handleUserInteraction(true);
+ }
+ }}Also applies to: 67-71
| const handleClose = async (shouldSaveValues: boolean) => { | ||
| let recordingId: string | undefined; | ||
| if (shouldSaveValues) { | ||
| recordingId = await loadRecordingId(); | ||
| } | ||
| await setEditorMode(false, recordingId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure proper error handling in asynchronous calls.
The handleClose function performs asynchronous operations which could potentially fail. Currently, there is no error handling implemented for these operations. To ensure the UI remains consistent in case of failures, consider wrapping these operations in a try-catch block.
const handleClose = async (shouldSaveValues: boolean) => {
let recordingId: string | undefined;
if (shouldSaveValues) {
recordingId = await loadRecordingId();
}
try {
await setEditorMode(false, recordingId);
onChangeState(RecordingState.CREATE);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to set editor mode or change state:', error);
// Handle error appropriately here
}
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Bug Fixes