Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to mincApply and pMincApply #2

Closed
mfriedel opened this issue Aug 13, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

Updates to mincApply and pMincApply #2

mfriedel opened this issue Aug 13, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@mfriedel
Copy link

Currently, when creating a function to be used by mincApply or pMincApply, the function must have only one argument (x), which indicates that the function must be executed on every voxel within the specified mask.

If possible, and to increase the reuseability of functions created for mincApply and pMincApply, it would be nice if they could take additional arguments. This would reduce the amount of hard-coded parameters within each function.

This might not be feasible and/or may require modification of minc2_model, which is probably undesirable.

At the very least, we should think about if this is possible and how to accomplish it.

mfriedel pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2014
mincMean, mincSd, mincVar, mincSum

Note: This also implicitly tests mincVoxel
Note #2: This was coded using data I have. All relevant parameters will need to be changed once we have a standard data set among all tests.
cfhammill added a commit to cfhammill/RMINC that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2016
First steps toward resolving issue Mouse-Imaging-Centre#2, this new variant can take multi-argument functions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants