Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.12.2] Large Integrated Circuits crash and corrupt the world when placed down #1316

Closed
ghost opened this issue Jun 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 9, 2018

Building an 8 bit full adder in PR Fabrication:

6492504c-8f82-4558-88a6-b300f846932c

This crashes the game whenever placed. Built a 48x48 variant, still crashes. I built an 8 bit ANDer (much less gates) and it doesn't crash, though the game lags for a second when placing it down.

Crash log:
`[16:14:53] [Server thread/WARN] [net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer]: Can't keep up! Did the system time change, or is the server overloaded? Running 7529ms behind, skipping 150 tick(s)
[16:14:53] [main/FATAL] [net.minecraft.client.Minecraft]: Error executing task
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at net.minecraft.util.Util.func_181617_a(SourceFile:47) [h.class:?]
at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_71411_J(Minecraft.java:1086) [bib.class:?]
at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_99999_d(Minecraft.java:397) [bib.class:?]
at net.minecraft.client.main.Main.main(SourceFile:123) [Main.class:?]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.Launch.launch(Launch.java:135) [launchwrapper-1.12.jar:?]
at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.Launch.main(Launch.java:28) [launchwrapper-1.12.jar:?]
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at tonius.simplyjetpacks.item.Jetpack.loadConfig(Jetpack.java:305) ~[Jetpack.class:?]
at tonius.simplyjetpacks.item.Jetpack.loadAllConfigs(Jetpack.java:230) ~[Jetpack.class:?]
at tonius.simplyjetpacks.network.message.MessageConfigSync.handleMessage(MessageConfigSync.java:51) ~[MessageConfigSync.class:?]
at tonius.simplyjetpacks.network.message.MessageConfigSync$1.run(MessageConfigSync.java:42) ~[MessageConfigSync$1.class:?]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) ~[?:1.8.0_171]
at net.minecraft.util.Util.func_181617_a(SourceFile:46) ~[h.class:?]
... 9 more
[16:14:53] [main/INFO] [Actually Additions]: Receiving (new or changed) Player Data for player jlunsford.
[16:14:53] [main/INFO] [net.minecraft.advancements.AdvancementList]: Loaded 48 advancements
[16:14:54] [main/WARN] [journeymap]: core (Initialized) Bad configField entry during updateFrom(): optionsManagerViewed=null
[16:14:54] [main/WARN] [journeymap]: core (Initialized) Bad configField entry during updateFrom(): splashViewed=null
[16:14:54] [main/INFO] [journeymap]: Loading journeymap.topo.config
[16:14:54] [main/INFO] [journeymap]: Loaded 3 waypoints from /Users/anthonyheddings/ftb/FTBContinuum/minecraft/journeymap/data/sp/The Brain/waypoints
[16:14:54] [main/INFO] [journeymap]: Mapping started in /Users/anthonyheddings/ftb/FTBContinuum/minecraft/journeymap/data/sp/The Brain/DIM0. Memory: 3703MB total, 1795MB free
[16:14:54] [JM-task-6/WARN] [journeymap]: java.lang.NullPointerException

[16:15:41] [Netty Local Client IO #4/ERROR] [FML]: NetworkDispatcher exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Payload may not be larger than 32767 bytes
at net.minecraft.network.play.client.CPacketCustomPayload.(CPacketCustomPayload.java:28) ~[lh.class:?]
at net.minecraftforge.fml.common.network.internal.FMLProxyPacket.toC17Packet(FMLProxyPacket.java:142) ~[FMLProxyPacket.class:?]
at net.minecraftforge.fml.common.network.handshake.NetworkDispatcher.write(NetworkDispatcher.java:534) ~[NetworkDispatcher.class:?]
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeWrite0(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:738) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeWriteAndFlush(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:801) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.write(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:814) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.writeAndFlush(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:794) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.writeAndFlush(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:831) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.writeAndFlush(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1032) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel.writeAndFlush(AbstractChannel.java:296) ~[netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at net.minecraft.network.NetworkManager$4.run(NetworkManager.java:245) [gw$4.class:?]
at io.netty.channel.DefaultEventLoop.run(DefaultEventLoop.java:54) [netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$5.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:858) [netty-all-4.1.9.Final.jar:4.1.9.Final]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_171]
[16:15:41] [Netty Local Client IO #4/INFO] [SimplyJetpacks]: Loading configuration files
[16:15:41] [main/INFO] [journeymap]: Mapping halted in /Users/anthonyheddings/ftb/FTBContinuum/minecraft/journeymap/data/sp/The Brain/DIM0
`

@MrTJP
Copy link
Owner

MrTJP commented Jun 12, 2018

Hmmm. Seems to happen when packets get very large. I thought CCL’s PacketCustom was suppose to handle splitting up large packets?

@covers1624
Copy link
Collaborator

I think it should? Ill check tomorrow and poke CB to see if that was intended, it /should/ be simple to do anyway.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 12, 2018

Yeah it seems to not just be me either, #1257

@MrTJP MrTJP added the bug label Jun 13, 2018
@MrTJP
Copy link
Owner

MrTJP commented Jun 13, 2018

Duplicate of #1257

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants