You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm seeing an worrisome odd bug for samtools stats output in the Stats section with the popup IDs (doesn't seem to be a problem in other sections).
The following two snapshots show the sample name for the highlighted spot as C12, but this is incorrect. For instance, in the Total Sequences pic the highlighed number appears to correspond to sample C4. In the 'Mapped & Paired' row the C12 sample is again incorrect and appears to correspond with N9. Both can be seen in the attached multiqc_samtools_stats.txt file, which seems to have the correct data based on a cursory look.
I have also attached the MultiQC log and other output files. The stats within appear to be parsed correctly from the reports.
@ewels not a problem, about to go on a short trip myself. I may check into it when I get back, if I can work out the issue I may set up a pull request.
I've just spotted the same error in a different beeswarm / dot plot (this one for Bismark). So I think that this is a bug somewhere in the plotting code. Looking into it now.
I think I tracked it down - there was a sort statement in the Javascript that I'd added at some point to improve the stacking of the dots. However, this broke the association with the sample names. Nasty bug sorry, and I hadn't noticed it as the overall shape of the plot remained the same.
I just pushed a fix, it's now working as expected for me so I've closed this issue. If you could try your samples above again and confirm that it's working for you too then that would be brilliant.
I'm seeing an worrisome odd bug for
samtools stats
output in theStats
section with the popup IDs (doesn't seem to be a problem in other sections).The following two snapshots show the sample name for the highlighted spot as
C12
, but this is incorrect. For instance, in the Total Sequences pic the highlighed number appears to correspond to sample C4. In the 'Mapped & Paired' row the C12 sample is again incorrect and appears to correspond with N9. Both can be seen in the attachedmultiqc_samtools_stats.txt
file, which seems to have the correct data based on a cursory look.I have also attached the MultiQC log and other output files. The stats within appear to be parsed correctly from the reports.
multiqc.log.txt
multiqc_general_stats.txt
multiqc_samtools_stats.txt
multiqc_sources.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: