Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2017. It is now read-only.

Fix for issue MvvmCross/MvvmCross#1181 #51

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2016
Merged

Fix for issue MvvmCross/MvvmCross#1181 #51

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2016

Conversation

ggirard07
Copy link
Contributor

Fix for issue MvvmCross/MvvmCross#1181

@ggirard07 ggirard07 changed the title Fix for issue #1181 Fix for issue MvvmCross/MvvmCross#1181 Jan 20, 2016
@Cheesebaron
Copy link
Member

Great, thanks. I have no idea why it was using Classic API in the first place.

@martijn00 martijn00 added this to the 4.0.0 milestone Jan 20, 2016
Cheesebaron added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2016
@Cheesebaron Cheesebaron merged commit e7b77df into MvvmCross:master Jan 20, 2016
@ggirard07
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am more worried about those who are adding obscure assembly references to their projects in order to get this working instead of trying to understand what is going on ^^

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants