Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3/n][transfer-to-object] Add SDK support for receiving objects #12987

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

tzakian
Copy link
Contributor

@tzakian tzakian commented Jul 13, 2023

Description

Adds support for constructing and sending transactions using the new Receiving transaction argument in the typescript and Rust SDKs.

The bottom commit adds typescript support and the top commit adds Rust SDK support (and has already been reviewed and approved).

Test Plan

Added a number of additional tests to the typescript SDK to make sure receiving arguments are handled correctly.


If your changes are not user-facing and not a breaking change, you can skip the following section. Otherwise, please indicate what changed, and then add to the Release Notes section as highlighted during the release process.

Type of Change (Check all that apply)

  • protocol change
  • user-visible impact
  • breaking change for a client SDKs
  • breaking change for FNs (FN binary must upgrade)
  • breaking change for validators or node operators (must upgrade binaries)
  • breaking change for on-chain data layout
  • necessitate either a data wipe or data migration

Release notes

Support has been added to both Typescript and Rust SDKs to construct transactions to receive previously-sent objects using the new transfer-to-object functionality and Receiving transaction argument. This functionality is currently only enabled in devnet.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 15, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
explorer ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
explorer-storybook ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
multisig-toolkit ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
mysten-ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
sui-kiosk ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
sui-typescript-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
sui-wallet-kit ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm
wallet-adapter ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2023 3:46pm

const inserted = this.#blockData.inputs.find(
(i) => i.type === 'object' && id === getIdFromCallArg(i.value),
);
return inserted ?? this.#input('object', value);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this also be an object input? It looks the same as the object helper, above. I noticed below that both object and receiving result in a type of object and then a different objectType, so maybe this works fine, but what happens if you pass a shared object arg into receiving? Seems like something we should protect against.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should work out since the actual building of the argument is done after-the-fact here https://github.com/MystenLabs/sui/blob/main/sdk/typescript/src/builder/TransactionBlock.ts#L668C1-L668C1 and that does checking at the time these placeholders are "inflated" to actual ReceivingRef/ObjectRef/SharedObjectRef arguments.

I kept Receiving as object since that lines up with what we have elsewhere in the codebase both in TS and in Rust for receiving (it's an ObjectArg with a Receiving variant in TS and in Rust).

It's a good idea to add a test or two for this though so will add that in :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a test for trying to pass a shared object to a receiving argument.

@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ it('can construct and serialize an empty tranaction', () => {
expect(() => tx.serialize()).not.toThrow();
});

it('can construct a receiving transaction argument', () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a test that verifies the effects of the receiving helper (i.e. that it's different from the effect of the object helper)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can, and I will!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a test to make sure that the effects generated by these are different.

@tzakian tzakian force-pushed the tzakian/tto-1 branch 2 times, most recently from 7128bab to f225f58 Compare September 22, 2023 18:17
Base automatically changed from tzakian/tto-1 to main September 22, 2023 21:56
tzakian added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
## Description 

This PR implements the core transfer-to-object functionality. In
particular it implements the ability to "receive" an object that was
sent to the address (object ID) of another object using one of the
`transfer` or `transfer_public` functions in the `transfer` module.

More detail is given on the programming model in the attached issue so I
will not go into that.

SDK support for receiving objects has been added in the two PRs stacked
on this one:
* #12987 Adds the `Receiving` type to the json-rpc types, and adds
support receiving objects in the Typescript SDK.
* #12988 Adds support for receiving objects in the Rust SDK
* #13420 Adds pruning of the `per_epoch_object_marker` table at epoch
boundaries

## Test Plan 

I've written a number of tests for this that I believe cover things:
* Execution-correctness tests for this in the transactional tests
* Tests for effect computation in the new sui-core
`transfer_to_object.rs` tests (e.g., receive-then-unwrap,
receive-unwrap-wrap, etc).
* Tests for lock-freeness of receiving arguments (i.e., that the object
identified by the `Receiving` argument is not locked at signing) in the
sui-core `transfer_to_object.rs` tests
* Tests that dependencies are correctly registered, and notified in the
transaction manager for `Receiving` arguments to transactions (see new
tests in the `transaction_manager_tests.rs` file).

A more detailed listing of the tests:
* PTBs
    - Receive object and return to PTB
- Do not do anything with the returned (non-drop) value
[`receive_return_object_dont_touch.move`]
- Call transfer object on it
[`receive_return_object_then_transfer.move`]
- Basic "can receive and then do something in the function"
[`basic_receive.move`]
- Duplicate "Receive" arguments to the PTB
[`duplicate_receive_argument.move`]
    - Pass but don't use `Receiving` argument, then later use it in PTB.
        - By immut ref [`pass_receiver_immut_then_reuse.move`]
        - By mut ref [`pass_receiver_mut_then_reuse.move`]
        - By value and returning it [`pass_through_then_receive.move`]
- Various combinations of receivership being passed
[`receive_by_ref.move`]
(checking borrow/borrow_mut, and restore rules for PTB execution)
    - Receive object of different type [`receive_invalid_type.move`]
- Receive object with non-address owner ownership
[`receive_object_owner.move`]
- Reuse of input receiving argument
[`take_receiver_then_try_to_reuse.move`]
* Type malleability [`receive_invalid_param_ty.move`]
    - Pass receiver into a non-receiver type
      - primitive type
      - struct type with same layout
      - struct type with different layout
    - Pass non-receiver into a receiver type
      - primitive type
      - struct type with same layout
      - struct type with different layout
* Resource conservation/Effects calculation (both transactional tests
and sui-core tests for explicit effects checks)
  - Do various things with object after receiving it:
- Immediately place it as a dynamic field
[`receive_dof_and_mutate.move`]
- Immediately add a dynamic field to it
[`receive_add_dof_and_mutate.move`]
- Immediately add a dynamic field to it, add as a dynamic field to
parent object, then mutate both [`receive_add_dof_and_mutate.move`]
    - Immediately transfer it [`receive_and_send_back.move`]
    - Immediately delete it [`receive_and_deleted.move`]
    - Immediately wrap it  [`receive_and_wrap.move`]
    - Immediately abort [`receive_and_abort.move`]
    - Don't use it [`receive_by_value_flow_through.move`]
- Receive multiple times in a row making sure effects stay in-sync as
expected [`receive_multiple_times_in_row.move`]
  - Shared objects
- Make sure we can receive if object is transferred to an object which
is already shared [`shared_parent/basic_receive.move`]
- Make sure we can receive if object is transferred to an object which
is then shared [`shared_parent/transfer_then_share.move`]
- Non-usage of receiving object argument off a shared parent object
[`shared_parent/drop_receiving.move`]
- Receive object off of shared parent, add as dynamic field of shared
parent and then mutate through the parent
[`shared_parent/receive_dof_and_mutate.move`]
- Send and receive the same object to the same shared parent multiple
times [`shared_parent/receive_multiple_times_in_row.move`]
- MVCC -- Test that we calculate contained UIDs correctly when we
receive an
    object. This is tested in [`mvcc/receive_object_dof.move`] and
    [`mvcc/receive_object_split_changes_dof.move`]
- Sui core tests checking explicit parts of the calculated effects to
make sure they match what we expect:
- Immediately unwrap then transfer inner object
[`transfer_to_object_tests.rs/test_tto_unwrap_transfer`]
- Immediately unwrap then delete inner object as well
[`transfer_to_object_tests.rs/test_tto_unwrap_delete`]
- Immediately unwrap then add inner object as dynamic field
[`transfer_to_object_tests.rs/test_tto_unwrap_add_as_dynamic_field`]
- Immediately unwrap, then wrap again -- this is part of the above since
adding a dynamic field wraps the object
- Basic object receive [`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_transfer`]
- Pass but don't ise Receiving argument
[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_unused_receiver`]
- Pass by different references
[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_pass_receiving_by_refs`]
- Receive and immediately delete
[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_delete`]
- Receive, wrap, and then transfer wrapped object
[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_wrap`]
* Sui Core for object locking and transaction dependendency calculation
in effects
- Test that receiving object arguments are not locked, and that
different
orders of execution for two certs that want to receive the same argument
(but only one is valid) can both be run in either order, and both return
    the same execution effects in either order
    [`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tt_not_locked`]
  - Test that transaction dependencies are added correctly:
    - Basic test that we add transaction dependendency if we execute
      successfully and receive the object
      [`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_valid_dependencies`]
    - Similar case for if we delete the object immediately

[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_valid_dependencies_delete_on_receive`]
- That we don't register the transaction dependendency if we don't
receive
      the object
      [`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_dependencies_dont_receive`]
- That we don't register the transaction dependendency if we don't
receive
      the object and we abort

[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_dependencies_dont_receive_but_abort`]
- That we register the dependendency if we received the object, even if
we
      then went on to abort in the transaction
[`transfer_to_object_tests/test_tto_dependencies_receive_and_abort`]
- Dynamic object field spoofing: make sure we don't accidentally
register a
dynamic object field load of an object that we want to receive at a
different version as a receivership of that object (i.e., don't register
      the transaction dependendency)
      [`transfer_to_object_tests/receive_and_dof_interleave`]

## Additional tests 
- PTBs
    - `MakeMoveVec`:
        - create but don't use [receive_many_move_vec.move]
- pass vec by value but don't receive [receive_many_move_vec.move]
- pass vec by ref then use value to receive in later command
[receive_many_move_vec.move]
- Pass vec by mut ref and pop/receive some, then receive rest in other
call [receive_many_move_vec.move]
- Pass vec by mut ref, only receive some [receive_many_move_vec.move]
- Pass vec by value, only receive some [receive_many_move_vec.move]
        - Pass vec by value, receive all [receive_many_move_vec.move]
- Pack receiving tickets into a struct (some/all) then receive
transitively [receive_duo_struct.move]
- Type mismatches:
- Receiving and phony struct with same struct layout and right type args
([receive_invalid_param_ty.move])
- Receiving with mismatched type args [move_vec_receiving_types.move]
- Receiving with multiple different type args
[move_vec_receiving_types.move]
- `TransferObjects`
- Try to transfer receiving ticket [receive_ticket_coin_operations.move]
- `SplitCoins`
- Try to split a receiving ticket [receive_ticket_coin_operations.move]
- `MergeCoins`
- Try to merge a receiving ticket [receive_ticket_coin_operations.move]
    
- MVCC [`receive_object_access_through_parent[dof/df].move`]
- Transaction input checks (in sui-core tests)
- Delete between cert and execution [tests in `test_tto_not_locked`in
the sui-core tests
- Cert denial if sending a transaction where `input_objects \intersect
receiving_object !=
{}` [`test_tto_intersection_input_and_receiving_objects`]
- Type-fixing for receiving arguments [pt_receive_type_fixing.move]

---
If your changes are not user-facing and not a breaking change, you can
skip the following section. Otherwise, please indicate what changed, and
then add to the Release Notes section as highlighted during the release
process.

### Type of Change (Check all that apply)

- [X] protocol change
- [X] user-visible impact
- [ ] breaking change for a client SDKs
- [X] breaking change for FNs (FN binary must upgrade)
- [X] breaking change for validators or node operators (must upgrade
binaries)
- [ ] breaking change for on-chain data layout
- [ ] necessitate either a data wipe or data migration

### Release notes

Added the ability to receive objects off of another object. This is
currently only turned on in devnet. More information on
transfer-to-object, receiving objects off of other objects, and current SDK support can be
found in the GitHub issue which can be found here:
#12658
@tzakian tzakian force-pushed the tzakian/tto-typescript-sdk-support branch from 57d8277 to 77b7863 Compare September 26, 2023 21:38
@tzakian tzakian force-pushed the tzakian/tto-typescript-sdk-support branch from 77b7863 to f98d4a4 Compare October 11, 2023 00:29
@tzakian tzakian force-pushed the tzakian/tto-typescript-sdk-support branch from f98d4a4 to 33a7fa8 Compare October 11, 2023 16:14
@tzakian tzakian force-pushed the tzakian/tto-typescript-sdk-support branch from 33a7fa8 to c1eb2d1 Compare October 16, 2023 15:43
@tzakian tzakian merged commit 0fbacf4 into main Oct 23, 2023
36 checks passed
@tzakian tzakian deleted the tzakian/tto-typescript-sdk-support branch October 23, 2023 15:35
jonas-lj pushed a commit to jonas-lj/sui that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
…enLabs#12987)

## Description 

Adds support for constructing and sending transactions using the new
`Receiving` transaction argument in the typescript and Rust SDKs.

The bottom commit adds typescript support and the top commit adds Rust
SDK support (and has already been reviewed and approved).

## Test Plan 

Added a number of additional tests to the typescript SDK to make sure
`receiving` arguments are handled correctly.

---
If your changes are not user-facing and not a breaking change, you can
skip the following section. Otherwise, please indicate what changed, and
then add to the Release Notes section as highlighted during the release
process.

### Type of Change (Check all that apply)

- [ ] protocol change
- [X] user-visible impact
- [ ] breaking change for a client SDKs
- [ ] breaking change for FNs (FN binary must upgrade)
- [ ] breaking change for validators or node operators (must upgrade
binaries)
- [ ] breaking change for on-chain data layout
- [ ] necessitate either a data wipe or data migration

### Release notes

Support has been added to both Typescript and Rust SDKs to construct
transactions to receive previously-sent objects using the new
transfer-to-object functionality and `Receiving` transaction argument.
Note: This functionality is currently only enabled on devnet and will not work on testnet or mainnet.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Transfer to Object
3 participants