-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate that Table_Character/Table_Binary fields match the field length definitions in the label #56
Comments
@msbentley do you have a product we could use for testing? |
I've just created a (rather silly, admittedly) example product: validate_test_fields.zip Two of the numeric fields here overlap. The product validates and indeed opens without error, but I can't think of a use case where this would be valid, but perhaps that's my lack of imagination (i.e. I'm not sure if this should be a warning or should fail validation...) |
Added error message when the definition of two fields in a Table_Character overlap.
|
I assume the same check should be applied to Table_Binary? |
@msbentley correct. do you by any chance have an example? if not, we can poke around. |
For Table_Binary? No, but I could take my Table_Character example and change it to binary, if you can't find anything else... |
thanks @msbentley we will ping you if we need it but we can probably do the conversion as well. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, validate does not report when the definition of two fields in a Table_Character overlap. This is a relatively common error by data producers, and should be easy to flag.
Describe the solution you'd like
validate should report an error if fields overlap
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: