Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Released DOI capability #24

Closed
jordanpadams opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Update Released DOI capability #24

jordanpadams opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Epic

Comments

@jordanpadams
Copy link
Member

Applicable requirements
🦄 #9

@tloubrieu-jpl
Copy link
Member

This will be done by implemented the draft/release function with a OSTI DOI label as input.

@tloubrieu-jpl
Copy link
Member

tloubrieu-jpl commented Jul 7, 2020

@jordanpadams @qchaupds

To me the core idea of the release action is to use the XML as it is produced by reserve or draft and be able to submit it to OSTI. This is already developed although not as an action yet which can be called in command line and this needs to register a transaction on its own (ticket #46 is about that).

The update released DOI action will take as input one of these XML that the user will be able to update before re-releasing it. So you will need to consider the OSTI format as an input. This is the basic implementation we can start with for ticket #26.

But as I think we mentioned in the morning we can also update from different formats (pds4 label, xsl spreadsheet). I am not sure if this should be an action standing by itself. That might be a flag –update-or-create that applies to reserve/draft/release actions. This would make the software tore-use the same doi record if the doi or lidvid is already in the database.

@tloubrieu-jpl
Copy link
Member

It is unclear what should be posted to OSTI for the release action.

We will discuss that specifically at 3:30 today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Epic
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants