edit Logical Consistency section

made edits according to Bryce's feedback (mostly)

docs/eml-semantic-annotations-primer.md

@@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ _Note: The subject described in the `rdf:Description` `about` attribute should a
 
 
 ### Logical Consistency
-Sounds easy, right? What could possibly go wrong?
 With semantic annotation, you are adding precise definitions of concepts and relationships that can be traversed 
 with computer logic. Annotations are not simply a set of loosely structured keywords!  This is a really powerful 
 addition to EML, and so it comes with some risk. The main thing you should ensure is that your annotations are 
@@ -386,7 +385,7 @@ Things to check:
 1. Be sure you have used the right classes, properties, or vocabularies for your annotation components
   1. Become familiar with the vocabularies in your annotation, especially definitions and relationships 
   1. Check with your community for specific recommendations on annotations at different levels 
-1. In additionalMetadata, don't combine `<annotations>` with more than one `<describes>` element. EML allows 1:many `<describes>` elements in one additionalMetadata section. So if you have 2 `<describes>` and 2 `<annotations>`, you will have 4 RDF statements. Make sure they are all true, and if not, break them up
+1. In `additionalMetadata`, don't combine `annotations` with more than one `describes` element. EML allows 1:many `describes` elements in one `additionalMetadata` section. So if you have 2 `describes` and 2 `annotations`, you will have 4 RDF statements. Make sure they are all true, and if not, break them up.