-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NTR] Add resolution definitions #125
Comments
For possible reference, there is this resolution term in AFO, which is defined as an iao:information content entity. THe question for us will be if this has to be defined as a measurement datum or a setting datum. EDIT: it became a 'data item' to not make such a fine grained decision |
@https://github.com/Stefano-Luin Stiamo cercando di mettere in ordine tra le diverse definizioni di "risoluzione". Vuoi contribuire anche tu? |
we will need to look up "spectral dispersion" as defined in CHARISMA, once it is in the https://wiki.charisma.ideaconsult.net/wiki/List_of_all_terms EDIT: so far only this exists, which doesn't seem to be related close enough to this issue: |
Resolution in science is, in general, the minimum difference between two measurements so that they can be resolved (i.e., they can be considered different). |
Another thing: the resolution trade-off, for what I read or wrote, is not linked to the fact that you cannot "resolve" more than one or two things with an instrument... It is more linked to the fact that, usually, the better one kind of resolution is, the worse are the others. E.g., in microscopy, to have very high spatial resolution, usually you need to integrate more time or in any case you need more time to acquire an image. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
The terms requested here should actually be defined in another ontology that has a much broader scope, e.g. some optical device ontology. To my knowledge there does not exist such an ontology within OBO, as most such devices are defined in OBI already with some overlap to CHMO. So we could think about requesting these terms in either, but probably better to request in OBI. We will thus add an editor note that explains this for now. |
There are four types of data resolution: spatial, spectral, radiometric and temporal. Many instruments can capture one or two types of resolution simultaneously, yet it is rare to find equipment capable of delivering on all four types. This phenomenon is known as the resolution trade-off. Most instruments measure the most commonly used types of resolutions: spatial and spectral. Together, spatial and spectral resolutions allow scientists to quantitatively measure factors such as color, space and detail.
Preferred term labels and textual definitions
Synonyms
...
Textual definition
s. above
Link to CHARISMA Wiki equivalent
None of them is exhausting.
Suggested parent term
Examples
Please provide a more detailed description that examplifies how the term is supposed to be used, in terms of what it is suppose to repesent (e.g. a concept or a relation).
Attribution
If you would like a nanoattribution, please indicate your ORCID id
Sources
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: