Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PerformanceCounterLayoutRenderer - Added Layout support for Instance #3579

Merged

Conversation

snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor

@snakefoot snakefoot commented Sep 2, 2019

Resolves #3569 and #304 by adding Layout-support for Instance-property

Note merge to master

@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

added merge, also for triggering azure pipelines

Copy link
Member

@304NotModified 304NotModified left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@304NotModified 304NotModified added this to the 4.6.8 milestone Sep 3, 2019
@snakefoot snakefoot force-pushed the PerformanceLayoutRendererLayout branch 3 times, most recently from 7084a5e to a65551f Compare September 4, 2019 20:46
@snakefoot snakefoot force-pushed the PerformanceLayoutRendererLayout branch from a65551f to 7fd50ae Compare September 4, 2019 21:13
@304NotModified 304NotModified merged commit 8094327 into NLog:master Sep 8, 2019
@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@304NotModified 304NotModified added enhancement Improvement on existing feature needs documentation on wiki labels Oct 25, 2019
@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

@snakefoot Do you think we should document this somewhere?

@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor Author

snakefoot commented Oct 25, 2019

@304NotModified Do you think we should document this somewhere?

Well everyone think that all properties in NLog supports layoutrenderers, then I guess it is okay giving the users that illusion here. Instead of writing everywhere that it doesn't work.

@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

OK!

@snakefoot snakefoot deleted the PerformanceLayoutRendererLayout branch April 4, 2020 12:53
@snakefoot snakefoot mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2021
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement on existing feature size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants