Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add g4_reg nc #180

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Mar 14, 2023
Merged

add g4_reg nc #180

merged 11 commits into from Mar 14, 2023

Conversation

RoyStegeman
Copy link
Member

@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman commented Mar 8, 2023

Includes polarized structure function $g_4$ at NLO

Reference for NNLO (eq. 19): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.12014.pdf

@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman marked this pull request as draft March 8, 2023 14:12
@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn added enhancement New feature or request physics physics features labels Mar 8, 2023
benchmarks/runners/apfel_.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/light/g4_nc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/light/g4_nc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/light/g4_nc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RoyStegeman
Copy link
Member Author

RoyStegeman commented Mar 9, 2023

@felixhekhorn if I run the benchmark I get only 0.0 as ouput for the apfel g4total. Is this something you understand?

Please ignore unrelated aspects of this PR, there's a reason I put it as draft ;)

@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2023 13:49
Co-authored-by: Giacomo Magni <39065935+giacomomagni@users.noreply.github.com>
@Radonirinaunimi
Copy link
Member

LGTM!

Just to mention that now all the references to the de Florian paper should be updated:

:cite:`deFlorian-light-nlo-pol`.

For a simpler expression, refer also to :eqref:`9` of :cite:`deFlorian-light-nlo-pol`.

@RoyStegeman
Copy link
Member Author

RoyStegeman commented Mar 14, 2023

That's the nlo paper, this is the nnlo paper.

Or do you mean replace the nlo with the nnlo paper? I don't think that matters very much if both are correct.

@Radonirinaunimi
Copy link
Member

That's the nlo paper, this is the nnlo paper.

Or do you mean replace the nlo with the nnlo paper, I don't think that matters very much if both are correct.

Yes, I meant replace. But as you say it doesn't matter that much, at least unless we use the equivalence relation everywhere.

So, please feel free to merge this into #173.

@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman merged commit 23668f4 into polarized-coeffs Mar 14, 2023
3 checks passed
@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman deleted the add_g4 branch March 14, 2023 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request physics physics features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants