Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Jet support #110

Closed
DavidHuber-NOAA opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #111
Closed

Update Jet support #110

DavidHuber-NOAA opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #111

Comments

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

A Jet module file should be created and all components re-tested to verify they still work on the system. Similarly, the modules should all be pointed towards the EPIC hpc-stack builds. First, MET and METplus need to be installed in that hpc-stack distribution.

@malloryprow
Copy link
Collaborator

@DavidHuber-NOAA Is there are plan for MET and METplus to be installed in the hpc-stack?

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@malloryprow It is available to be installed and newer versions of MET/METplus (10.1.2/4.1.3) have already been installed on Hera and Orion (I believe to support UFS SRW validation). For Jet, it's desired because the current installations in /contrib use older dependencies, making it difficult to play nicely with the workflow.

@malloryprow
Copy link
Collaborator

Are MET v9.1.3 and METplus v3.1.1 installed? EMC_verif-global uses those versions. I haven't updated to the most recent version because of the development for https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/EVS I have been doing the past year+.

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@malloryprow Those versions aren't installed yet, but I have requested them. And thank you for the info RE EVS! That's very good to know that a followup system is in the works.

DavidHuber-NOAA added a commit to DavidHuber-NOAA/EMC_verif-global that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2023
@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

EPIC was able to install MET/METplus 9.1.3/3.1.1 on Jet, which I was able to cycle test. PR forthcoming.

@malloryprow
Copy link
Collaborator

malloryprow commented Mar 13, 2023

Great, I'm heading out for the day soon, but will check it out tomorrow morning. Though I have on my calendar there is a Jet Outage tomorrow? Not sure if you want me to check any output, or if you feel the output from NOAA-EMC/global-workflow#1301 suffices.

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

DavidHuber-NOAA commented Mar 13, 2023

The logs do have a few messages in them that might be worth checking out, though they don't seem to affect the outcomes. I've pushed the logs over to Hera (/scratch1/NESDIS/nesdis-rdo2/David.Huber/para/com/jet_tc_192_logs/*/gfsmetp*). It looks like there may be a bug in run_verif_global_in_global_workflow.sh. There are a few places (e.g. line 145) where SDATE_GFS_YYYYMMDDHH is not in the expected format (2022-04-01 instead of 2022040100, for instance). I suspect this is a bug on all platforms, not just Jet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants