You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
are defined as 3D arrays while ignore the fourth time dimension of the actual netcdf variables. This treatment had been working (for example, passed verification by original non-parallel version). However @edwardhartnett pointed out it is wrong and, at least, potentially, could cause unexpected behavior.
Hence, a quick fix to increase those parameters to 4d arrays are needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…SI failure … (#698)
**DUE DATE for merger of this PR into `develop` is 3/27/2024 (six weeks
after PR creation).**
Resolves#693 (Thanks to @edwardhartnett 's suggestions)
Resolves # 694 ( this PR is not able to provide a stable solution, more
details would be given on the issue page)
Resolves # 697: With larger requested memory for each mpi task, it still
showed, for some time, the differences in the analysis files between
loproc vs hiproc for the control runs on hercules. whether integrating
this with the refactored IO part would provide a stable solution remains
to be seen.
This PR resolved the newly emerged issue with IO of netcdf files in the
continuous storage, with upgraded FV3REG IO for the cold start options.
(Co author Ming Hu @hu5970 )
This PR is being worked on in collaboration with Pete Johnson through
RDHPCS help desk, @RussTreadon-NOAA@DavidHuber-NOAA and thanks to help
from @ed Raghue Reddy through RDHPCS help desk.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ting Lei <tlei@hercules-login-4.hpc.msstate.edu>
Co-authored-by: Ting.Lei-NOAA <ting.lei@dlogin08.dogwood.wcoss2.ncep.noaa.gov>
In the current fv3reg GSI, the location /size parameters in netcdf sub calls as startloc and countloc below :
are defined as 3D arrays while ignore the fourth time dimension of the actual netcdf variables. This treatment had been working (for example, passed verification by original non-parallel version). However @edwardhartnett pointed out it is wrong and, at least, potentially, could cause unexpected behavior.
Hence, a quick fix to increase those parameters to 4d arrays are needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: