Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #5196 - valueAsJSON does not respect type #5197

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

jmarrec
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmarrec jmarrec commented May 14, 2024

Pull request overview

Pull Request Author

  • Model API Changes / Additions
  • Any new or modified fields have been implemented in the EnergyPlus ForwardTranslator (and ReverseTranslator as appropriate)
  • Model API methods are tested (in src/model/test)
  • EnergyPlus ForwardTranslator Tests (in src/energyplus/Test)
  • If a new object or method, added a test in NREL/OpenStudio-resources: Add Link
  • If needed, added VersionTranslation rules for the objects (src/osversion/VersionTranslator.cpp)
  • Verified that C# bindings built fine on Windows, partial classes used as needed, etc.
  • All new and existing tests passes
  • If methods have been deprecated, update rest of code to use the new methods

Labels:

  • If change to an IDD file, add the label IDDChange
  • If breaking existing API, add the label APIChange
  • If deemed ready, add label Pull Request - Ready for CI so that CI builds your PR

Review Checklist

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • Code Style, strip trailing whitespace, etc.
  • All related changes have been implemented: model changes, model tests, FT changes, FT tests, VersionTranslation, OS App
  • Labeling is ok
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified

@jmarrec jmarrec added the Pull Request - Ready for CI This pull request if finalized and is ready for continuous integration verification prior to merge. label May 14, 2024
@jmarrec jmarrec self-assigned this May 14, 2024
@shorowit
Copy link
Contributor

Did a quick test with ruby and it works correctly. Thanks, @jmarrec!

@shorowit
Copy link
Contributor

@jmarrec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmarrec commented May 15, 2024

Integer was broken after that quick fix.

Ok I see I got tripped up by reading a probably EXTREMELY outdated documentation for Json::Value (yeah, it's from 0.5.0...)

https://jsoncpp.sourceforge.net/class_json_1_1_value.html#ec4f74ef7b776b1d9c8a10fc3bb4add5

This commit from cough 13 years ago (json 0.7.0) changed the behavior

open-source-parsers/jsoncpp@1b138e8

@jmarrec jmarrec force-pushed the 5196_OSArgument_valueAsJSON branch from 98c9d16 to c05003a Compare May 15, 2024 07:56
@jmarrec jmarrec merged commit 650ea36 into develop May 15, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@jmarrec jmarrec deleted the 5196_OSArgument_valueAsJSON branch May 15, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Pull Request - Ready for CI This pull request if finalized and is ready for continuous integration verification prior to merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

runner.getArgumentValues does not honor argument data type
3 participants