-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
MI-R1.3-88b52fa7b8-EXPERIMENT_TOOL_NAME.md
82 lines (63 loc) · 3.17 KB
/
MI-R1.3-88b52fa7b8-EXPERIMENT_TOOL_NAME.md
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
# TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-88b52fa7b8-EXPERIMENT_TOOL_NAME
## Authors:
Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990
#### Publication Date: 2021-03-18
#### Last Edit: 2024-04-13
#### Accepted: pending
### Maturity Indicator Identifier: [MI-R1.3-88b52fa7b8-EXPERIMENT_TOOL_NAME](https://w3id.org/nsdra/maturity-indicator/readme/MI-R1.3-88b52fa7b8-EXPERIMENT_TOOL_NAME)
This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3:
(meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards
The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):
1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
1. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
1. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
1. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file
This MI is to indicate if the experiment "tool name" is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.
### Maturity Indicator Name: The experiment tool name is reported by the nano toxicity study
This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper
**Title:** Metadata Stewardship in Nanosafety Research: Community-Driven Organization of Metadata Schemas to Support FAIR NanoScience Data
**REF:** https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102033
### To which principle does it apply?
R1.3
### What is being measured?
If the experiment tool name is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.
### Why should we measure it?
This is one of the nano particle's (NP) agglomeration-related metadata relevant for delivered dose (DD)
assessment as a means to facilitate correct interpretation of in vitro bioassays and support data reuse (case study value: ISDD).
### What must be provided for the measurement?
If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:
| Field Name | Alternative terms |
| --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| experiment tool name | experiment-tool-name,<br>experiment_tool_name |
### How is the measurement executed?
The "experiment tool name" should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.
### What is/are considered valid result(s)?
The presence of the field "experiment tool name" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.
### For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')
For nano toxicity related datasets.
### Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)
```{json}
{
"@context": {
"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
"schema": "https://schema.org/",
"citation": "schema:citation",
"name": "schema:name",
"url": "schema:url",
"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
"unitText": "schema:unitText"
},
"@type": "schema:Dataset",
"name": "Dataset title",
"@id": "Dataset DOI",
"url": "Dataset URL",
"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
"variableMeasured": [
{
"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
"name": "experiment tool name"
}
]
}
```
### Comments