Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

Change introductory text to reflect deployment experience #39

Closed
larseggert opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #41
Closed

Change introductory text to reflect deployment experience #39

larseggert opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #41
Assignees
Labels
editorial Editorial change relative to RFC8312 or earlier bis versions

Comments

@larseggert
Copy link
Contributor

The abstract, introduction and other text throughout the document need to be updated to reflect the significantly broader deployment experience CUBIC has seen since RFC8312 was published. At that time, it had been the default for Linux for years, but since then, it's also been the default for Windows and Apple stacks.

@larseggert larseggert added editorial Editorial change relative to RFC8312 or earlier bis versions help wanted Looking for someone resolve this issue labels Feb 2, 2021
@lisongxu
Copy link
Contributor

lisongxu commented Feb 3, 2021

Thanks, Lars. I can help to revise the text later next week, is it ok?

@goelvidhi goelvidhi added editorial Editorial change relative to RFC8312 or earlier bis versions and removed editorial Editorial change relative to RFC8312 or earlier bis versions help wanted Looking for someone resolve this issue labels Feb 4, 2021
@goelvidhi
Copy link
Contributor

@lisongxu I just wanted to check with you if you'd have time to work on it? :-)

@lisongxu
Copy link
Contributor

lisongxu commented Feb 16, 2021 via email

@larseggert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mon, Feb 22 is the cutoff date for i-D submissions for IETF-110. If we're not ready to submit by then, we'll have to wait until mid-March. Which isn't a huge issue, but since we're going to ask for WG adoption, it would be nice to have a more up-to-date I-D to discuss.

@lisongxu
Copy link
Contributor

lisongxu commented Feb 17, 2021 via email

@larseggert larseggert linked a pull request Feb 18, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
editorial Editorial change relative to RFC8312 or earlier bis versions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants