Analysis in [FHP00] doesn't include delayed ACK factor

[larseggert]

Yoshi said:

7: Section 4.3 I think The analysis in [FHP00] doesn't include delayed ACK factor. So, the AIMD TCP model here
can be a bit aggressive compared to a TCP that doesn't enable ABC and uses delayed ACK.
This is fine, but I think it might be good to clarify it.

[lisongxu]

Thanks, Yoshi. Yes, we can clarify this in the specification.

[larseggert]

@lisongxu could you create a PR for this?

[lisongxu]

Sure, working on it. Sorry for the delay. Lisong

…

________________________________ From: Lars Eggert ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 6:27 AM To: NTAP/rfc8312bis ***@***.***> Cc: Lisong Xu ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [NTAP/rfc8312bis] Analysis in [FHP00] doesn't include delayed ACK factor (#66) Non-NU Email

________________________________ @lisongxu<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_lisongxu&d=DwMCaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=8GgbmpxpPRnPS9z8_jUQhw&m=8itWjWYYxX7tJjCUJLGzLZLzKJRebd3BCnYFz49lBJU&s=u_7Aabjrf69KQzvUs7STEWtZU0bwldtMkXN8yJ_b7rk&e=> could you create a PR for this? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_NTAP_rfc8312bis_issues_66-23issuecomment-2D880617882&d=DwMCaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=8GgbmpxpPRnPS9z8_jUQhw&m=8itWjWYYxX7tJjCUJLGzLZLzKJRebd3BCnYFz49lBJU&s=BL_vXgMK_ulvdP77MbhDEJ8kpyZlWHrD5mWIa7YqhcI&e=>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_ACPRVINXAIIPZ5WVTULUZR3TX3A2JANCNFSM454H2VLA&d=DwMCaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=8GgbmpxpPRnPS9z8_jUQhw&m=8itWjWYYxX7tJjCUJLGzLZLzKJRebd3BCnYFz49lBJU&s=383go1JfNiih-80bN0TcW_UDZhBsrGkFzxKBdHwfuDQ&e=>.