Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds Dominator Guns [Poll Ongoing] #550

Closed

Conversation

RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor

Dominators:

  • A Unique gun that requires the user to have Security access to fire it.
  • The Gun will NOT fire if the user is a criminal
  • The Gun will NOT stun the target if the target is not a criminal (If you're shot with this, and it stuns you, you literally can't scream "shitcurity" because you need to be in the Sec Records listed as a criminal)
  • The Beepsky sec record trick DOES work with Dominators

Specs:

  • Double the Taser's Stun
  • Double the Taser's Weaken
  • Double the Taser's Ammo

Code Extras:

  • Adds a human helper proc "IsCriminal()" which checks for valid criminal ranks in Sec Records

Thread: http://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=387

- Note: Still contains debug markers as I'm waiting for sprites
@RemieRichards RemieRichards changed the title Adds Dominator Guns [Needs Sprites] Adds Dominator Guns [Needs Sprites] [Poll Ongoing] May 11, 2014
@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

needs unique sprite and kill modes pls

@RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor Author

Look at the tile miggles

[Needs Sprites]

Also the Kill modes will probably not get in or will have to come later, due to them requiring extra balance etc.

@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

it should honestly be an admin item first, then balanced
i dont think know about giving security guns that are just references to anime

@RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Atskadan The Poll has shown the players are (majority) in favor of the Unique concepts of the Dominator in it's Current implementation, I think that's fine enough to add it/run a test of them in the code for a while.

@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

if youre not going to make it a direct reference to psycho-pass, you should change the name
it would be dumb to call it a dominator and it doesnt even look like one

@RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jeez miggles a name is a name. but ok I guess I'll look for a new name for them.

@RemieRichards RemieRichards changed the title Adds Dominator Guns [Needs Sprites] [Poll Ongoing] Adds Dominator Guns [Poll Ongoing] May 12, 2014
@Neerti
Copy link
Contributor

Neerti commented May 13, 2014

Gar Glasses

No Refernces

@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

its not >no references
its >no inaccurate references
*this isnt a rule btw

@RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well the only included references are:

  • The Name
  • It's "officer" only characteristic
  • It's only criminals are shot characteristic

those are the 3 references, all are accurate.
The point is you want something more like the dominator, and considering that will likely never get added, you'd rather this "half way" stage is renamed, Correct?

@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

Well I mean the whole concept is based off of the ones from Pyscho-Pass, it's just not complete. I just don't personally like inaccurately referencing something. You don't have to rename it if you don't want.
Like, the e-sword could easily be renamed to "lightsaber." But that would be dumb, because it's just based on the same concept. It's an obvious reference to Star Wars, but it's still called something else.

@Iamgoofball
Copy link
Contributor

how about we allow creative license @Atskadan

@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

*this isnt a rule btw

did you miss the part where everything i say is opinions

@RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor Author

Experiment failed, not wanted/not balanced fairly.

@Atskadan
Copy link
Contributor

@RemieRichards just make it admin spawnable pls

@RemieRichards
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe later. My branches are all tied up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants