Fix potential race condition in _rmapiRmControl

[Cwndmiao]

`
diff --git a/src/nvidia/src/kernel/rmapi/control.c b/src/nvidia/src/kernel/rmapi/control.c
index 0ed2e1e7..140386ba 100644
--- a/src/nvidia/src/kernel/rmapi/control.c
+++ b/src/nvidia/src/kernel/rmapi/control.c
@@ -427,13 +427,6 @@ _rmapiRmControl(NvHandle hClient, NvHandle hObject, NvU32 cmd, NvP64 pUserParams
}
}

• // Potential race condition if run lockless?
• if (serverutilGetClientUnderLock(hClient) == NULL)
• {

•    rmStatus = NV_ERR_INVALID_CLIENT;
  

•    goto done;
  

• }
• // only kernel clients can issue raised IRQL or lock bypass cmds
  // bypass client priv check for internal calls done on behalf of lower priv
  // clients
  `

serverutilGetClientUnderLock() in _rmapiRmControl() is useless, and may cause race condition if someone else is creating/destroying RmClient simultaneously.

[mtijanic]

Thanks for pointing this out! While not entirely useless (it validates hClient) that call is quite unfortunate, both in the race condition/crash potential and in that it performs a somewhat expensive lookup only to discard the result.

I'm not sure simply removing it is the right way to go, as then apps can poke around the state quite a bit without allocating the client (e.g. you could get all the cached data).

So while this path definitely needs to be refactored, I'm gonna have to dwell on this for a bit and get back to you in a few days. Thanks again!

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[mtijanic]

Hey, I think we'll merge this change as-is, and then maybe handle the rest as a separate thing, or not at all. I'll start the process of applying it internally, but it will likely only show up in r565.xx release. This PR will have to stay open until then. Sorry for the slow and arcane process.

And thanks again for the PR, this is really appreciated! Anything else you come across, please let us know, as PR or bug report.

[Cwndmiao]

Thanks for your timely reply :)