Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconcile people with identifiers #18

Closed
osma opened this issue Jan 27, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Reconcile people with identifiers #18

osma opened this issue Jan 27, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@osma
Copy link
Member

osma commented Jan 27, 2017

Currently people mentioned in e.g. 100 and 700 fields are converted to resources by marc2bibframe and there is no reconciliation, so there is lots of duplication even from within the same MARC record. We should instead link to URIs for people in the output.

The problem is that currently we don't have the person authority record IDs in the bibliographic records. This is being worked on on the Aleph side. Probably it makes sense to wait for that instead of doing our own reconciliation.

@osma osma changed the title Reconciliate people with identifiers Reconcile people with identifiers Jan 27, 2017
@osma
Copy link
Member Author

osma commented Aug 18, 2017

Now we have the first batch of person authority IDs in the Aleph bibliographic records.

@osma
Copy link
Member Author

osma commented Sep 11, 2017

The first step would be to use URIs generated from the authority record IDs for the people, instead of blank nodes or URIs generated from the bibliographic record ID.

@osma
Copy link
Member Author

osma commented Sep 11, 2017

Should also do this for person subjects (600)

@osma
Copy link
Member Author

osma commented Sep 11, 2017

In future we should use the authorized names from the person names authority (like we do with CN) but for now this approach should be enough to get reasonably clean data for publishing

@osma
Copy link
Member Author

osma commented Sep 12, 2017

Created a separate issue for the authorized person names. Other than that, this is done.

@osma osma closed this as completed Sep 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant