Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[2.2] Use absolute XSL stylesheet path and source VERSION for manual pages #459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2023
Merged

[2.2] Use absolute XSL stylesheet path and source VERSION for manual pages #459

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2023

Conversation

rdmark
Copy link
Member

@rdmark rdmark commented Sep 3, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Improvements to manual page scripts

  • Use an absolute path to XSL stylesheet dir, so that we can use system provided resources f.e.
  • Source VERSION in the parent dir instead of specifying manually. This is possible since the manual sources now live in the main repo.
  • Flesh out README

@rdmark rdmark changed the title [2.2] Use absolute XSL stylesheet path [2.2] Use absolute XSL stylesheet path to generate manual pages Sep 3, 2023
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 3, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

warning The version of Java (11.0.17) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

@rdmark rdmark changed the title [2.2] Use absolute XSL stylesheet path to generate manual pages [2.2] Use absolute XSL stylesheet path and source VERSION for manual pages Sep 3, 2023
@rdmark rdmark merged commit 0ad2bd9 into branch-netatalk-2-2 Sep 4, 2023
5 checks passed
@rdmark rdmark deleted the rdmark-issue-458 branch September 4, 2023 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dgsga dgsga dgsga approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@rdmark @dgsga