Rename some Operator* classes to OnSubscribe* as per #1270 #1286
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…mplementations to start with OnSubscribe
…tor-to-onsubscribe
|
RxJava-pull-requests #1187 SUCCESS |
benjchristensen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2014
Rename some Operator* classes to OnSubscribe* as per #1270
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See discussion in issue #1270.
Numerous classes in the
rx.operatorpackage are not implementations ofOperatorbut are actually implementations ofOnSubscribe. The classes have been renamed in this pull request.Excuse me not squashing commits, looked complicated after doing a pull from upstream in the middle.